Post by
MTStack on Jul 10, 2024 7:41am
Appeals in C 2418-2021 decided
Appeals: 12751-2022, 13320-2022 and 10103-2023
Two of the appeals confirmed that the evidence points issued by the Court remain unchanged. The third appeal confirmed the time extension declared for the exhorto was correct, although Exhorto 152945-2022 was since been returned without result. That appeal also confirmed that the resolution declaring that Steve Holt’s testimony was evasive was correct.
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 10, 2024 4:21pm
Can you remind us time aged handicappers in brief what the evidence points were? Or redirect to the appeal info you likely posted earlier. Steve Holt gave evidence similar to some US House inquiries. I know nothing, I see nothing, I hear nothing......................thanks Shultzy ! Always grateful.
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 10, 2024 10:34pm
Pardon my generalities but what is point in all these appeals if Mordequeo Unda Llanos was/is the rightful current owner (Teseros) that passed on the mineral right claims to the contested disputed areas to CMN his forever employer ? Lopehandia has to date not had any formal legal confirmation on his claims. Is this correct or did I /we miss a most excellent Chile Supreme Court ruling ?
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 13, 2024 10:06am
How much MSX stock have you owned ?
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 14, 2024 5:03pm
Where do you think JL is getting money from ? I can attest that the money has dried up for some time now. If Torres's only source of income was from JL, he is developing multi recipes for KRAFT diner a la boulonnaise. No TICKEY no LAUNDRY !