Predictmedix AI Inc C.PMED

PMED vs SONA

[badog222]

Check the following link to see what happens when a product does not appear to work out.   It can get ugly

https://stockhouse.com/news/press-releases/2020/11/26/investigation-alert-the-schall-law-firm-announces-it-is-investigating-claims

I believe PMED and SONA have used the same marketing / promotion firm.    They both have products that were supposed to test for Covid-19.    PMED is also seeking the ability to use AI to test for other things also but still no success that I am aware of.

If PMED continues to provide no proof that the AI testing works... PMED could end up like SONA IMHO.   Maybe even worse

All my opinion only

Badog

[patience1]

Badog, that's why I'm interested to see what the Mcgill University research study with PMED's tech shows.  One would think they wouldn't send it to the university level if they didn't believe it could produce positive results, right?

[badog222]

patience1.... They have been testing this for how long now????   Has it been over a year????  With no positive results to report??? Maybe they are seeking help to make it work???     But the more I think about this the harder it seems to use facial features to determine much of anything.   There are so many variables....and even those variable can change

[patience1]

Badog, you're a broken record here. No need for 10 paragraphs for a simple question... They are obviously seeking to have it validated at a high level. Again, if they didn't think it was provable they wouldn't have partnered with McGill, correct?

[badog222]

Again, if they didn't think it was provable they wouldn't have partnered with McGill, correct? Maybe the reason they have partnered with McGill is to seek help because they cannot make it work to date?    And the reason you think I sound like a broken record is because every time another partner is announced I'm wondering why it is not an announcement of success with

[patience1]

I'm sorry but they wouldn't be deploying these in Canada and India as of last week if it didn't work. The McGill study is for further validation at an academic level.

[LaurinDE]

Predictmedix share price got inflated when a small group engaged in some premature promotion activities... unfortunately, it was all just promises and the company never lived up to expectations. So either their technology doesn't work or they are lousy businessmen or both... or I am just to impatient. L.

[badog222]

patience1.... Where is the news of the contracts showing projected revenues that go with the depolyment? Badog

[TruthBeTold7]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[badog222]

'The McGill study is for further validation at an academic level.' 'Further validation'?    What validation do we have already?  Deployment of machines is not validation IMHO.  Could be for more testing? Plus I'm not sure investors need validation at an academic level.   What investors need is validation at the customer level.   This

[patience1]

Ah there's badog on the ceo.ca board. Not enough chatter on here so we must go over to another board to bash.  Does it get old crying all day long to random people on blogs all day?

[badog222]

I post what I think.   When it doesn't go along with what you promote you label it bashing.   The nice thing here is that you cannot control what is posted.  You prefer it when you can. I am not crying....not at all.   You must take it personal.   Let's stick to the merits of the stock...OK? Badog

[badog222]

By the way.....Very big companies with almost unlimited AI resources have been working on Atonomous (self driving) vehicles for a long time now and that still is not perfected.   It has many flaws.   These technologies takes forever to perfect.    Badog