Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Rise Gold Ord Shs C.RISE

Alternate Symbol(s):  RYES

Rise Gold Corp. is a Canada-based exploration-stage mining company. The Company's principal asset is the past-producing Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine property (I-M Mine Property) located in Nevada County, California, United States. The I-M Mine Property is a past producing high-grade property near Grass Valley, California, United States, which the Company owns outright through its wholly owned... see more

CSE:RISE - Post Discussion

Rise Gold Ord Shs > Court case decision doesn't charge him with Direct Involv.
View:
Post by Jamesrncarson on Jul 18, 2023 5:06am

Court case decision doesn't charge him with Direct Involv.

This is why a third party will probably look after the safety aspects of the mine.  The mine as it stands is an ecological disaster, has been for years.  Let Rise Gold get it cleaned up.

In his written judgement, Judge Patterson repeatedly stated that he had his suspicions about the charges on which Mossman was exonerated, but that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mossman was directly responsible for the environmental damage resulting from the well-documented spills. The judge stated that the testimony of the prosecution’s primary witness, the mine’s Environmental Manager and Site Biologist was flawed because of “her profound hostility, animosity, and negative attitude” towards Mr. Mossman and the trial process, as well as her less than satisfactory recollection of the events prior to the 2015 shutdown of the Yellow Giant Mine. The judge stated that he believed the evidentiary record on those charges was incomplete and required speculation on his part as to Mossman’s direct involvement in the decisions which resulted in the environmental damage.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities