Revive Therapeutics Ltd C.RVV

RVV will do fine. It's in a niche as a reactive drug(s)

[RandomGuy1]

There's been thousands of deaths attributed to the vaccine in the USA alone so not everyone is willing to take it.

[OneBigFish]

Those reports are mostly not caused by the vaccines. If you got the vaccine and were run over by a car you would still find yourself in the VAERS database. As far as I know there have only been a few deaths that are attributeable to the vaccines worldwide due to anaphalaxis or blood clotting.

[RandomGuy1]

You think the CDC would include the death of someone via homicide/vehicular accidents after they've had the vaccine...?  That sounds too easy to filter out.   If that's the case, the other vaccines in the VAERS would be exponentially higher.  

[1ottrunner]

If the trial is a success it won't matter what is in place as a therapeutic, RVV will see huge gains.  Even vaccinated there is no guarantee you won't get sick, mild illness is a possibility.  Also if efficacy suffers over time there will be a period where additional people will suffer mild symptons.

[mopar1969]

"There's been thousands of deaths attributed to the vaccine in the USA alone so not everyone is willing to take it."  It's false statments like this (mainly spread by right wingers in the US) that cause people to be fearful of vaccines. The world would be freaking out if this were true. They pause a vaccine at any hint of trouble. https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news

[CrazyProphet]

I have lost track of current timelines should we not be moving into the possible halt zone sometime soon ?????

[1ottrunner]

With 26 sites recruiting one would expect 400 patients could be found within a week, 15 per site. The first step after data review would be identifying the dose, 100 vs. 200 mg, and the study switching from 1:1:1 to 2:1. When I asked MF he did not offer a response, tight lipped. The study reads that the dose review would happen after the first interim analysis, was that done at 200?  Is

[RandomGuy1]

I love the unncessary comment of political affiliation ;) I know you're probably one of the "I LOVE SCIENCE" crowd and all but my information came from the CDC VAERS database.  Can you refute that instead of posting a random article which may have an incredible amount of bias?  Especially when the main contributors to media outlets for advertisements are pharmaceutical

[mopar1969]

Yes, I follow the science. What else is there? Apparently no news article interpreting the data will be good enough. It is impossible to debate an anti-vaccer, so I'm not going to spent hours trying to dig up stats. You are a danger to society. I will leave it at that.

[RandomGuy1]

Haha.  Yes I am an anti-vaccer because I mentioned the deaths from a new emergency-use vaccine. How does it feel to be at the end of your life?  Your youth is gone.  Your children do not care for you anymore. Your grandchildren (even if you have any) will prefer a gadget (iPad) to their own grandfather.  You are part of a generation of people who have sold out their children&

[mopar1969]

Haha. Bad guess, Trumper.

[RandomGuy1]

i heart science | Soy Boy Face / Soyjak | Know Your Meme

[1ottrunner]

Time to stop self-medicating and see a doctor.

[RandomGuy1]

I am not a MtF like you, so I don't need the anti-depressants.  

[1ottrunner]

Second