Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sona Nanotech Inc C.SONA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNANF

Sona Nanotech Inc. is a nanotechnology life sciences company, which is engaged in developing targeted hyperthermia therapy. The Company has developed multiple methods for the manufacturing of various types of gold nanoparticles (GNR). It is engaged in research and development of its technology for use in multiplex diagnostic testing platforms and advanced biomedical applications. Its gold... see more

CSE:SONA - Post Discussion

Sona Nanotech Inc > It is high time Health Canada...
View:
Post by oxinos on Nov 20, 2020 8:07am

It is high time Health Canada...

Came to the conclusion that PCR tests should not be used to compare the accuracy of Antigen tests as they are used right now by magnifying the virus to above CT >25 .
Every time the CT, (Count Threshold), goes up by one, the virus is actually multiplied or magnified by 10 times. This means that by CT 25 the PCR test has magnified traces of the virus to millions when in reality there are just a few in the Specimens. 
Antigen tests don't magnify the virus count but rather detect what is in all likelihood contagious virus. That is why we have to change our thinking about the reliability of PCR as being the standard that every other test must be compared to.
Comment by newbieontario64 on Nov 20, 2020 2:19pm
I also emailed Arlen,   he said  "I would take what PHAC says as accurate"  I sent the tweet to him, they are working with us
Comment by Jimc409 on Nov 20, 2020 2:27pm
One message is enough....we get it!
Comment by newbieontario64 on Nov 20, 2020 3:11pm
rolling on
Comment by TheeRook on Nov 20, 2020 2:20pm
  Many in the medical field were once refered to as Quacks, probably many still are.. Without a  qRT-PCR ,  how would the Viral Load be measured? Just like any tools some people do not know how to use them properly. Its been long known, after 2 weeks of Symptoms RT-PCR, will be detecting the tailend of an infection.  After 2 weeks of symptoms, an Antibody test should be also ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities