Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s):  TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution... see more

CSE:TNY - Post Discussion

Tinley Beverage Company Inc > Cotts of Cannabis
View:
Post by LukeSkySmoker on Dec 17, 2020 1:27pm

Cotts of Cannabis

That had been the goal since day one period! Jeff likes this analogy. Turning down a big player for exclusive production is what will save us from a premature takeover. Once the Co packing clients are revealed and we take our cash for the services I truly believe we will in a place were the next 5 quarter's will provide everyone with enough excitement to fill their boots. Tinley's never fluffed up news. They kept true to their direction and I believe that "early on interest" is the reason for keeping the share price low. No need for fluff when the big ones are already on the line. If I had a big ol pot company I would rather have experienced beverage pioneers with daily access to the playing field building a distribution network with product's that can be award winning based on FLAVOUR....proof of concept. Now that is a horse that every kart's gonna want. For people like Rick, Ted, Jeff, Baron, Andrew......well....to take a chance and leverage their unique abilities and conections competing in this new beverage space. Any big company looking to add a new liquid revenue stream gets more than just a key to turn. They will get the distribution network being forged ahead with beckett's while we wait for rules to change. I always liked the fact that we remained under the radar while we able to dominate the grey space do to our size. That's why we already knew that cans killed thc in beverages years before CGC. You can own the biggest beverage company in the world but you can't buy time! Shelf life is one thing that money can't buy. One of the few things Tinley's got in front of. Someone a lot smarter than me knew this to. When you see constellation and CGC wrestle with all the problems that Jeff worked out years before on a private placement type budget THAT does not go unnoticed. Not one word so far about copackers.....man I remember when we almost lost that trial placement in 7-11 in Texas due to people phoning into locations trying to do DD on hemplify sales and placement. That alone tells me that we are getting in bed with a bigger player. Someone else is controlling this roll out timing especially if 11 or so other clients have kept radio silence. That tells me that there is a level of professionalism here that must be well respected. Even Aurora couldn't keep their holes plugged when coke came by for a peek. This means to me that our team is measuring up well with the best executive teams out their. Confidence in one ability to fully trust another in partnership especially in a new space where I see the consolidation of other companies of late using US assets and canadian CEO's to take the starting blocks. That is a very good sign the lobbyists are more in the know than they are letting on.
Comment by Reitguy on Dec 17, 2020 1:49pm
My understanding is they can copack upto 1 million bottles per month.  If all went well how much could they profit from this?  
Comment by LukeSkySmoker on Dec 17, 2020 2:52pm
I would say that is the wild card. I would imagine it will be based on tiered offerings based on alot of factors. But what interested me the most is that advertising is the highest cost when competition starts. I definitely am no expert here but even if some of our Co packers use their own marketing experts due to maybe in house experts.....we benefit. Over the last few years we have seen tidbits ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities