Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s):  TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution... see more

CSE:TNY - Post Discussion

View:
Post by BurlapSack on Aug 19, 2021 5:28pm

Questions

How much product had to be destroyed? What happened to all the old bottles too? Who's paying for all these mistakes? How are they going to make any money off this supposed IP? This is all a pump. This is planned and coordinated.
Comment by BudBus on Aug 19, 2021 6:28pm
Who said they destroyed any inventory? You’re just making this up. No product had been produced except pilot product, which wasn’t for sale anyway. The amber & sleeve rules are for all cannabis beverages in Canada, not just Tinley. Pretty much every glass bottle on shelves in the country today is no longer compliant. HOTBB!
Comment by BurlapSack on Aug 19, 2021 6:35pm
They said they had produced products last year for a production run. Those products weren't compliant and whatever the "bottling issue" is supposed to mean. Guess what happens to faulty/non-compliant inventory.
Comment by geodcan on Aug 19, 2021 6:49pm
Policy makers rejecting certain bottle types and plain wrapping is just one of those things that we don't need.   Stateside , there was a problem with 2000 cases needing different labels.  I believe they wrote that off.   That kind of shyt costs a lot of money so before you do a huge run of your product you better make sure it is done according to the wishes of the no ...more  
Comment by BurlapSack on Aug 19, 2021 7:12pm
We all know what happened to the inventory in California. What we don't know is how much was destroyed and how much it cost because of their dodgy accounting practices. I dont believe a word of what Maser says... I bet they knew all of this for months and they were hiding the truth from investors. I bet you that all those crazy shorts were told exactly when to place their bets and when to pull ...more  
Comment by scotianbot on Aug 19, 2021 7:51pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by BurlapSack on Aug 19, 2021 8:41pm
How does this have anything to do with Tinley/Jeff not being able to lock down very easy to follow packaging rules? How in the world do they screw up something as fundamental to bottling operations such as the ACTUAL BOTTLES they use? You can't make this stuff up.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities