Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s):  TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution... see more

CSE:TNY - Post Discussion

Tinley Beverage Company Inc > Shareprice speaks volumes since
View:
Post by geodcan on Nov 26, 2021 5:38pm

Shareprice speaks volumes since

the good old days of $2 shares.  

Jeff was driving the bus through the potholes and changing routes of our journey.  Hindsight tells me that investors think he was a failure.

We now have him on the backburner with Rick stepping up with a couple of chosen ones.  It's hard to ignore that our updated team has pretty much been there all along and Tinley has come to where it is and shareholders don't have any way of assessing the value of our shares.

Certainly the market of fellow shareholders aren't giving this much value, judging from current shareprice and new shareholders seem non-existant.  

The Long Beach facility seems to be the only thing of value for the money raised and spent.  And the license is in Ricks name.

This seems to be following the same script of another investement I owned where the shareholders were uninformed and clearly put in last place on the priority list while the story was always good but the shareprice dwindled until nobody cared anymore but the ones higher up the food chain who waited it out until the shareprice was a penny.

They came in as white nights with an all or nothing offer for 2c which the majority of shareholders took so they could salvage something.  The white night acquisitors moved into the bricks and mortar with the IP and rights to the pharmaceutical and seem to be thriving privately today.

It irks me that Tinley seems like deja vu to me with some heavy shareholders taking the wheel of a company headed towards the cliff who are telling us that everything is allright while the facts are very different.

It looks to me like there will be a bottling facility left with revenue and profit potential, in the right hands.  Our bottling experts came up short as experts who should have been able to get this going full tilt but it drags on.

Rick seems to have the most interest in the bottling facility and he controls the license which makes me wonder if this was all pre-planned with ulterior motive.  

This facility will idealistically crank out 36 million units a year with all 3 lines working and we heard a minimum of .50c per unit.  That leaves $18 million before expenses which will be mostly labour and ingredients.  I am just guesstimating that we might wind up with $9 million a year which I can see spread to 3 major shareholders with little left for the shareholders who financed the whole thing.

I don't know what we are worth as an acquisition by a major player which seems more and more like a possibility if this remains in the hands of the first run of shareholders.  If they tank it, all bets are off.

Long Beach looks like a nice little revenue source as a privately scooped company with original shareholders left to their own devices without their investments.

I hope I am wrong and that our team has integrity and reputation  and will do shareholders right!

glta and dyodd
Comment by Pedronocents on Nov 26, 2021 6:12pm
If the updated team has been there in the background for the last couple years and now the roles have reversed with Ringo [Jeff] still pulling the shots behind closed doors then what has changed? If we see non descriptive information with the next earnings report then you know Ringo is still saying, No fluff NR's. Funny how there is very little if any follow-up on what they say? How is the ...more  
Comment by DieBartDie on Nov 26, 2021 6:29pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by DieBartDie on Nov 26, 2021 8:41pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by sneakysneaky on Nov 26, 2021 10:34pm
Think of all the times anonymous users have suggested Tilney's a fraud with 0 co-packers as early as last year.   Think of all the times they said Richard was leaving and he just bought another Million shares.   Think of all the times trolls suggested Lakewood wouldn't get their license renewed, now they are suggesting Lakewood will buy Tinley for a ...more  
Comment by DieBartDie on Nov 27, 2021 6:39pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities