Tantalex Lithium Resources Corporation C.TTX

TTX Report

[stocktrader2021]

May I request if anyone can help me understand what is bad in this news " 

Tantalex Resources Corporation Reports Results from Initial Phase 1 Drilling Assay Results from 5 Dumps at Manono Lithium Tailings Project with Best Intercepts of 34m at 0.88% Li2O from surface in MDA-059 on the G dump and 7m at 1.22% Li2O from surface in MDC-056 on the K dump"

[stocktrader2021]

If I understand correctly, we were calculating $$$ based on assumption to have at keast 0.5% but we actually have 0.88%@ 34m and 1.22% on G dump at juat 7m.... what is wrong with these results?

[Lisan]

It's all good and almost risk free at this level. because TTX have made a commitment to go into production plus excellent grades with Ta and Sn.. The only ones that are disapointed are those that were in for a quick buck without knowing exactly what they were doing. In other words the sheep!

[KozmoT]

What's wrong with those results is that they are the BEST ones. From ALL THE DUMPS!  Now go look at all the rest. Did you look at the results for C, G, H and I dumps?  There were entire drillholes they ever even bothered to have assayed!! And then there is the tantalum numbers! They seem to average around 20 - 25 PPM ... that is Parts Per Million  Economic Tantalum ore is

[gimmycash2]

if one good thing came out of this ,you joined humanity in 2022 .i was starting to get wooried about you.lol tick tock tick tock ,i had to add two more tick tocks becouse it might still be a little while until all the othe 75% of the assays come back and the extension is drilled and assayed..lmfao  so i guess we got another year together.hhahahahahaha

[stocktrader2021]

Wher ahve you seen complete report? can you past a link here please Kozmo?

[gimmycash2]

three out out of the five had very good grades ,and two had economical tin and tantalum.i guess now we have a year of this craaap to put up with..you really have turned stupid into an art. 

[KozmoT]

What?! Only one dump had anything that could even remotely be considered decent grades - K Dump.  You do know people here can go look at the numbers in the NR for themselves ... right?  They can aklso go look at your past posts that told them they had 105 Mt of over 1%.  Turns out they aren't even in the ballpark!!

[gimmycash2]

hey dummy ,G had .884%,h ad .34 % and K had 1.22% even that .34% is better than 1% sitting 500ft underground.did i not say you were going to look real stupid,tick tock buddy you know it i know it the guys trying to milk everything under .13 know it. you think fat made you look dumb,this is going to put you in a class of stupid all by yourself.very soon.

[KozmoT]

Are you deliberately trying to mislead people? That 0.88% was one subsection from ONE HOLE on the entire dump!!  The other holes returned dismal results... ALL of them under 0.1% !!             Dump ID

[gimmycash2]

bla bla bla ,short term production upon the flowsheet testing..tick tock