Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Global UAV Technologies Ltd C.UAV

Alternate Symbol(s):  YRLLF

Global UAV Technologies Ltd. is a diversified, vertically integrated drone technology company within the commercial Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sector. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, provides a full range of UAV-based services and products, including production, research and design of professional grade UAV’s, geophysics and remote sensing survey services, and regulatory... see more

CSE:UAV - Post Discussion

Global UAV Technologies Ltd > My Q2 analysis
View:
Post by zero2million on Jul 03, 2018 8:58am

My Q2 analysis

Here are the basics:

Best Quarterly revenue to date of $537,153. This was mostly because of Pioneer Aerial with a little help from High Eye.

This amount does not include any revenues from the AIR acquisition as that deal was formally closed in Q3.

 

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) is a funny one with UAV… In my conversations with management it was made very clear that the per-job margins are very high, but it varies on the job location. So when I see COGS of $6K for this quarter I’m not convinced these margins will carry on once the other subsidiaries are operational. my guess is that there is no allocation of overhead, labour or materials as most of the jobs are outsourced to contractors. I believe that annual financial statements will better reflect the true COGS amount, especially when the other Subs start operating.

 

Im happy to see that expenses have decreased Q over Q. Subcontractors fee’s, Wages and Management and Consultants fee’s are the largest expenses, which of course represent the actual day-to-day operations of UAV. I’d expect these accounts to go up proportionately with revenues.

Im happy to see that Share-based compensation is gone (hopefully forever!), and Salaries and wages are up. This removes the ambiguity around expenses. 

 

Including ‘Other items’ (which are not gains/losses from normal operating activities), the net loss is $328,670. This number has been decreasing gradually. I expect UAV to be profitable only once other subsidiaries are online, contributing to top-line growth. This may happen this year, but considering the acquisition of AIR, I bet there will be impairment losses at year end, which will tip the scale to the negative.

So my profitability target is only in 2019.

 

The capital raise of $1.77 million:

The good: More money = more expenditure on R&D, exploration of new markets, procuring top talent.

The bad: Dilution. 

The ugly: The common shareholders will want to see results sooner than those who bought into the PP. If UAV cant show the fruit of the capital raise soon, then shareholders will lose patience. The PP participants wont mind sitting on their shares for a while as they can exercise their warrants for a nice profit in the coming years.

 

I hope that once UAV is cashflow positive and self sufficient, they will announce a share buyback of reverse split or whatever other tool they want in order to reduce share count. Generally speaking, I don't mind dilution early on in a companies life in order to fund growth. I’d be more concerned if UAV was a mature company needing to raise capital. Additionally, I like that insiders have bought into the company via PP. 

 

About the balance sheet, the current ratio is 2.2. Assets are increasing, Inventory increasing (Novarial probably), Liabilities are minimal and thats just Q2. Q3 will increase cash and longterm assets (from AIR) significantly. A healthy balance sheet gives confidence to shareholders, and institutions. In the future, I’d hope to see an announcement that UAV secures a line of credit from a bank. This means UAV wont have to raise money by issuing more shares. This can only happen when UAV’s financial statements are less risky, which I believe is happening Q over Q.


Overall, Im very optimistic about UAV’s future. All trends are positive. Share price is undervalued  in comparison with FLT or DVR. In the drone market in general, UAV’s multiples are relatively low. I believe UAV will get noticed eventually and when it does will probably be trading at +$0.25 which has been my target for a while.

 

Im heavily invested in UAV, which probably makes me biased. But I also do investing for a living so, hopefully I know a good investment when I see one ;)

 

As much as i’d want to see UAV’s SP jump up really quickly, i’d rather have slow growth over a few months in order to reduce volatility and speculation.

 

Now that financials are out, I'm expecting heavier news flow from management about new contracts and/or new markets to pursue.

 

Good luck!

 

Comment by Sealthedeal2018 on Jul 03, 2018 10:06am
zero2million I have one question for you. If you do investing for a living why would you suggest or hope for some type of reverse split? In all my year's of investing, reverse splints have never been in favor of the investor. Please explain
Comment by zero2million on Jul 03, 2018 11:39am
Hi Sealthedeal2018, Im glad someone actually reads my posts!  I was talking about the reverse split as a tool rather than an actual strategy. The idea behind what I wrote is ultimately to reduce inherent shareholder risks associated with too many shares outstanding, and to increase shareholder value.  Also, I dont believe they will actually do this in the next year or two unless they ...more  
Comment by Sealthedeal2018 on Jul 03, 2018 12:01pm
Thanks for responding: But does this note effect the investor negatively? Ie: If I had 100,000 shares - reverse split is 2:1 = 50,000 shares - stock price goes from 9 cents to 18 cents - Let's say the stock run s to $1 for easy math. Now my investment is worth $50k rather than $100k. How does this impact me positively? I'll always be down half of my initial investment
Comment by Copperdreamer on Jul 03, 2018 12:02pm
In my years of investing, I have never seen this as a positive for any junior company, so very odd to be promoting this as a valid strategy. Reverse splits serve as a dilution tool. This can be a strategy, and sometimes the only one, if there is a very large shareholder who continues to dump the stock, and there is not enough buyers to absorb the dumping to keep the stock price up. However ...more  
Comment by zero2million on Jul 03, 2018 6:28pm
What the heck everyone?!?! Of all the great discussion points I raised about UAV's recent quarter, ya'll decide to talk about reverse stock splits? seriously?? That was just an example of something they could do in the distant future, which by the way I dont recommend as a strategy!!! Loosen up people, focus on what UAV is achieving NOW!  They are a fast growing company in a market ...more  
Comment by Sealthedeal2018 on Jul 03, 2018 7:27pm
Sorry, I didn't want to make this a reverse split forum. I apologize. However zero2million your first sentence in paragraph 6 of your Q2 analysis wasn't an example. It was something you hoped for and was just wondering why? Good luck Longs
Comment by divot111 on Jul 04, 2018 1:16pm
What they are achieving is a lower shareprice seemingly every damnn day, week, month and year. YES! I’d say that are doing a fantastic job of deteriorating shareholder wealth. As long as insiders and consultants made bank who cares. Penny stocks are not about the common shareholder. I don’t think I will even buy 6’s now when they arrive. And they will imho. I see 4’s and then probably a reverse ...more  
Comment by Joseph_K on Jul 04, 2018 1:08am
I thought it was a good analysis.   It felt like the reverse split 'discussion' was more of an attempt to bury your quality post than anything else - if not, I apologize.    Hey, a reverse split is a valid strategy and even necessary sometimes to move up to larger exchanges.   Unfortunately it has a negative stigma because 90% of the time it is a desperation ...more  
Comment by greenonions on Jul 04, 2018 9:52am
Thanks for your insights Joseph & Zero.  These posts are the reason why I still monitor this stockhouse message board.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities