Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Cayden Resources Inc CDKNF

GREY:CDKNF - Post Discussion

Cayden Resources Inc > Interesting . . .
View:
Post by Shylock on Sep 27, 2014 4:23pm

Interesting . . .

Do you all remember the comment by Bebek that all that CYD really had was "potential" when he responded to the question asked by Jay Taylor on behalf of one of his subscribers at the conclusion of his recent interview of him on Jay Taylor Media?

Well, it seems that besides Sean Boyd who by his purchasing CYD for a song believes it has far more than potential, someone else believes likewise.  PI Financial mining analyst Christos Doulis says this about CYD, Cayden is not a producer but it's a quality project that will likely be among the lower-cost producers.

https://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/tell-us-christos-doulis-can-gold-act-as-a-safe-haven-again

Gentlemen, it is becoming increasingly obvious in my humble opinion that we are being royally screwed by the management of CYD out of a resource worth at the very least twice to thrice what we are slated to receive.  In due time Cayden will be a SET of major assets worth billions and we are getting a lousy nine-hundredths of a share of AEM for it per share of CYD.  Three times that would be less than it is worth.

This is absolutely a case where management gets the gold and the shareholders get the shaft.

This is the stuff shareholder rebellions are made of and if the shareholders of CYD do not have a cause for such, I do not know who has.  In this case, though, the rebellion would not be about poor stock performance as a consequence of poor managerial performance but about excellent stock performance to be truncated by management for no legitimate good reason, thus failing to act in the best interests of shareholders.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_rebellion
Comment by TruthMachine1 on Sep 27, 2014 6:20pm
Shylock, I feel your pain but this is pretty much a done deal.  Ivan Bebek will defend his $14.1 million dollar payday to the death. The other BOD's will defend their lavash payouts as well.  Time to start looking at better prospects that are on sale and call it a day.
Comment by Scott6500shares on Sep 29, 2014 7:48pm
so, if the company is worth 1 Billion, why is that management would not want 20% of a billion instead of the little they are getting now?  What nefarious scenario have you envisioned?  I think it is simply an asset being sold in a down market because gold has been down for three years and they are worried it will go down even longer maybe forever. this is what happens at bottoms. If gold ...more  
Comment by Shylock on Sep 30, 2014 4:25am
Do not be so bloody naive. It is just as TruthMachine1 stated.  Bebek wants his 14M and the rest of the cutthroats want their big payoffs and they want it NOW.  They are not patient enough for development of this company to take its natural course and result in a higher price for all.  If you really think gold is going down "forever" then you have no business in this ...more  
Comment by goldpolka on Sep 30, 2014 7:26am
Has anyone reviewed what the severance arrangements are for top Executives.  I think that in addition to the profits on shares and options, this is also significant.  Another reason for them to sell. In any case, I don't think we should be tanking this deal unless we want a $1.50 stock again for the forseeable future.
Comment by Scott6500shares on Sep 30, 2014 1:46pm
I didn't say gold was going down forever, I was stating what the possible mindset of management was/is. This site really has some childish members. I've been doing this for 30 years. So I don't think that I am the one who is naïve. I"m done.