Post by
NobleHouse on May 27, 2024 2:24pm
Bttmfischer
So let's resort to semantics rather than the much more important question of the power of dividends reinvested that Reddeer talked about.I have limited computer savvy but it took me 2 minutes asking one question to find 2 sites , that l read but many more that l haven't as of yet.Two l will mention are a report by the Hartford fund that that states since 1960 , 85% of total return has been attributed to dividends reinvested, , another site A Wealth of Common Sense has gone back to 1928 and their charts have shown a considerably higher return from divs reinvested rather than just growth from non div companies.Now Bttmfischer rather than stating that Red is inventing numbers or RBC , why don't you do some DD before questioning and denying a post by someone just trying to help.I used to enjoy your posts but this time you are so far out in left field , that l doubt with binoculars you could see Home plate. Reddeer you nailed it perfectly.Good for you and those who listen and act accordingly.
Comment by
NobleHouse on May 28, 2024 8:32am
So that's it , just pack up your bat and ball and go home.I think Reddeer called in right that you don't want to bother with DD and any source he or for that matter l quote is in your way of thinking , not unimpeachable or worthy of consideration.I am not sure exactly what source you would consider reliable , but to the best of my knowledge , God has yet to write a book on the subject.