Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Claude Res Inc CLGRF

"Claude Resources Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of gold and other precious metal properties. Its projects include Seabee Property and various exploration properties located at Laonil Lake. It also owns Amisk Gold Property."

GREY:CLGRF - Post Discussion

Claude Res Inc > Looks like SSO is a sinking ship
View:
Post by ERTguy on Mar 14, 2016 8:53pm

Looks like SSO is a sinking ship

And dragging CRJ right down with it.  IMO if this goes below the closing price the day before the takeover was announced I could see shareholders voting no for obvious reasons.  I'll be accumulating shares if this dips below 1.25 as this stock was set to run to 1.40 without the takeover news.  Cheers
Comment by Highwired7 on Mar 14, 2016 9:07pm
ERT, will either companies share holders have the votes and ability to vote this deal down?
Comment by ERTguy on Mar 15, 2016 1:41am
Claude shareholders does have the ability to vote this down.  They require 66.6% of the shareholders to say yes to the deal in order for the transaction to be finalized.  You can blame some of this pull back on gold correcting, however I was confident this stock would have been trading at 1.40 without the takeover news.  If I was a shareholder still I'd be voting this down now.
Comment by Aurum1983 on Mar 15, 2016 8:43am
SSO holders can also vote this down by a majority vote. If CRJ holders rejects the deal then it won't get that far. I reckon SSO holders are not convinced this deal is what they need to turn SSO around otherwise why have they drag both companies down to this level? The combined market cap is only 853M for chri*t sake. The sooner we accept that there would be no deal the sooner we can get back ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities