Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

justification for RAven is claim of robust economi

[mokita]

2guys, read CEC Technical report and government submissions.  The central claim given for coal mine development in the Comox Valley is economic.  CEC continues to state unequivocally on its Jan 2013 webpage that the economics for Raven are "ROBUST."  The report cited uses outdated information.  Some would argue this misinformation places CEC in a position of intentionally deceiving investors, especially given the highly speculative nature of any prediction that coal prices etc. will increase once, hypothetically, Raven goes into operation.  Also, missing from feasibility study are the millions needed for financing such a project.

buyer beware.

[supra48]

 You could say that for any stock on the venture exchange, could you not !!!

[2guys]

The information is all there in black and white mokita.   You're just lying and being deceptive in order to continue your agenda of misinformation here and wherever else you feel like wasting your precious time. 

[mokita]

  Wood Mckenzie, who did the financial analysis for Raven economics bases  projections of robust economics on outdated  2010 prices and projections.  CEC feasibility study uses $174 a tonne average price (Met andThermal) to claim feasibility wheras today's average price is $105 a tonne.  Yet in its Jan. 2013 website update,  CEC  continues to state ROBUST

[chrisale]

Speaking of First Nations, apparently there was a community meeting on the Tseshaht reserve in Port Alberni about the Raven mine this past week including a visit from Mr. Tapics.