Trump Media & Technology Group Corp DJT

Well....I pondered this the other day before the trial

[westcoastlogger]

I hear some media outfits now saying it will be a daunting, if not impossible task, to find an impartial jury for this Democrat clownshow. Just throw all this garbage in the can where it belongs now, and save the time and money and realize that Trumps right to a speedy trial will never be met.

[dart321]

LOL that's a nice big belly buster logjam, after his legal team threw everthing they could against the wall to see if anything would stick to delay,delay,delay. A person who thinks they are not guilty never tries throwing chit at the wall, they really do want a speedy trial. LOL jogjam that was a good laugh.

[westcoastlogger]

You weren't laughing about anything so cut the BS. Where are they going to find jurors who have never heard of the most famous person on earth, or have an opinion of him?? Some hermit living in a culvert in northern Siberia that doesn't understand english maybe??

[dart321]

LOL, did they find enough for the E-Jean Carol case? Oh the trial for that one was in the same building as this one. Did they find enough for that sexual ??? case?  Oh and wasn't he found guilt of sexual ????

[westcoastlogger]

It doesn't matter what your opinion whether they tried to delay or not is. Its his right to try to delay as long as possible and its his right to a speedy trial also. Its the constitution and the law. Its not just my imagination.

[dart321]

Maybe you should go back over the many years he has gone to trial. I will save you the time, each and EVERY trial he has tried to delay, once he had his day in court after all his delays he lost each and every case. In my opinion he will lose this one also and I think the D.C. case will get to trial this year. 

[westcoastlogger]

Your looking in the rearview mirror and don't jump to conclusions but your entitled to your opinion, In my opinion of course.

[Dudtycat]

Words have only limited meaning! Let your actions speak!

[dart321]

No I look at the truthfull FACTS before I draw any opinion of guilt or not. The facts here and in all his other cases in Georgia, mar-a-logo, and DC all point to him as guilty as charged. What ever the jury finds will be from factual data not BS speaches from trump. You can't make a speach with bs in court. Only the truth comes out and in my opinion it will be devistating against trump

[westcoastlogger]

Don't jump to conclusions what may happen in this case. Remember OJ??

[tylerreddick]

There is zero need to "jump to conclusions", the evidence is clear. What I worry about is a Trump supporter lying to get on the jury, then refusing to convict, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. That is the unjust world Trump has created.

[Moemoney42]

Poor ol logjam.. sure grasping at straws lately.. too funny..!! Maybe he should pay more attention to his "healthcare" stock that's at another 52 week low today..!  Or maybe his mining stock that hasn't traded one share today..!! LMAO.. Yup a real W. Buffet in the making.. LMAO..!! 

[tylerreddick]

Potential jurors don't have to be unaware of Trump, just able to listen to the evidence and render a fair verdict. Of course that eliminates all republicans and/or Trump supporters, as they wouldn't know the truth if it hit them over the head. Your idea that jurors have to be unaware of who Trump is just reveals how little you know about the process.

[KozmoT]

Um, Trump garnered over 3.2 million votes in New York so it shouldn't be hard to find an impartial jury. As for Trump's chance of a speedy trial ... were you joking?!?!  He is the one who wants it delayed.  How did that go over your head?  And you guys call yourselves the party of Law and Order?  thanks for the laugh.