Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Core Gold DMMIF

Core Gold Inc is a gold mining company based in Canada with all operations in Southern Ecuador. The company primarily explores for gold and silver. Some of its projects includes Zaruma Mine & Portovelo Mill, Dynasty Goldfield and Copper Duke Project.

OTCQX:DMMIF - Post Discussion

Core Gold > 'Legal Enforcement of Stock Exchange Rules'
View:
Post by RONNIE111 on Nov 28, 2019 10:28pm

'Legal Enforcement of Stock Exchange Rules'

Spiritflyer, I have been thinking more about the ,legal opinion, I think it would be called, that you posted a few posts ago, titled as in the subject of this post, by Paul Latimer  12-1-1995.

In that opinion it appears ,as you said, that shareholders may be able to go after the company, the company directors personally, and (and this is the biggy) the stock exchange (In Australia the ASX), if the listing rules aren't followed.

And the article talked about any 'aggrieved' persons being able to take that action.

"most significantly, the Supreme Court may order the observance of, enforcement of, or giving effect to, the business rules or listing rules of a stock exchange on the application of the commission or any person aggrieved by the failure to observe, enforce or give effect to those rules." 

And then I started to think: who is more 'aggreived' than you and me, and all the other Core shareholders that Titan has been trying to ,uh, do bad things to.  And the ASX not doing their regulatory duties has very much   facilitated that for Titan.  Doesn't matter that we are not Aussies, money knows no borders etc.  

Like you , I am not a lawyer. I do enjoy watching legal dramas on TV, and at times like this I think it may have been fun to be a lawyer.  And for sure we all hope that this will shortly be all a moot point, as Titan crashes and burns.  And if the Aussie guys want to go after Titan, the ASX, or the Titan Principals (and the article defines the Principals very broadly) , for the long term and egregious breaking of all manner of listing rules,  that will be up to them.

But I still find it interesting.  I managed to come up with an email address for Mr. Paul Latimer, the author of the opinion, and will send him a letter , and hopefully he will want to chat. He wrote the 'opinion' in 1995, but still seems to be active.   I have been hoping to make some sort of contact with someone in Australia , like him, for awhile, but to no avail.  Maybe he would take some interest in Titan: Titan being such an extreme case of rule breaking.  And his article was all about ways to enforce the rules.
Comment by Spiritflyer on Nov 29, 2019 10:01am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities