Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Equal Energy Ltd EQU

NYSE:EQU - Post Discussion

Equal Energy Ltd > Middle ground
View:
Post by templetooth on Dec 07, 2012 1:22pm

Middle ground

The story thus far: asset sales have brought in almost $130 million and debt has been reduced to just the $42 million in convertible debentures.  Considering cash on hand, net debt at year end is supposed to be $23 million. Equal expects 2013 cash flow of $33 million (at $3.90 gas) with capital expense of $36 mil. Nawar sees cash flow of $45 mil at $4.25 gas. Co. uses mmbtu's vs. Nawar's mcf.

The 20 cent dividend works out to $7 million annual expense. Seems like a paltry reward to long-suffering shareholders, but OK, I can live with it.

I would like to see the company make a substantial issuer bid to buy back 8 million shares as per Nawar's suggestion. Presume this could be done at $4, total cost $32 million thereby bringing debt to $55 mil. If cash flow comes in around $30 mil that would equate to 1.83 debt to CF, disregarding annual interest. With 8 million fewer shares, annual dividend "savings" would be $1.6 million which would be 5% of $32 million buyback cost. I haven't looked up the interest rate on the credit line.

I agree with Nawar it makes little sense to expand production with gas prices at $3.63 today.

I can't see Nawar et al backing down, and if it comes to a proxy battle I've already committed to him. His plans are probably financially aggressive, but imaginative. The company's plan just isn't going to cut it, witness the disappointing market reaction. Middle ground, anyone?

Comment by bakken13 on Dec 09, 2012 9:03am
"I would like to see the company make a substantial issuer bid to buy back 8 million shares as per Nawar's suggestion. Presume this could be done at $4, total cost $32 million thereby bringing debt to $55 mil. If cash flow comes in around $30 mil that would equate to 1.83 debt to CF" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just one ...more  
Comment by bakken13 on Dec 09, 2012 9:34am
Just one correction to my previous post. Of course they would have the cash flow from production to drill some wells, but not enough to maintain production at a steady rate. All things being "equal", production and cash flow would decrease, as would the ability to pay the dividend. I suppose everything depends on the price of nat gas and the associated liquids increasing. If that does ...more  
Comment by sandyrickster on Dec 09, 2012 12:01pm
Its ok bakken13, no need to correct yourself...... no one cares about your posts anyway....
Comment by fibonnaci on Dec 09, 2012 2:48pm
x2
Comment by dbeaude on Dec 09, 2012 10:13pm
As you know Nawar, I have already sent two letters to the Chairman. Folks Nawar is right. The Chairman and BOD NEED to see that there is broad shareholder dissatisfaction with the conclusion of the strategic review and its dreadful outcome wrt the performance of the share price. Here is a thought..... Reduce the capex to $20 million from $36 Move the executive to Oklahoma and close the Calgary ...more  
Comment by sculpin2 on Dec 10, 2012 12:26pm
This sounds like a good plan.
Comment by Nawaralsaadi on Dec 10, 2012 5:35pm
just a correction, here is the correct link the shareholders website: https://www.saveequalenergy.com/ Regards, Nawar
Comment by dbeaude on Dec 10, 2012 9:28pm
My plan was really a lesser version of your and Adam's. I agree that the easy part is penning thoughts down on this board. Thanks for driving this Nawar. Equal shareholders need a leader and I am thankful we have one with a very substantial ownership in the company.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities