Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD

GREY:ESOFD - Post Discussion

Alpha Minerals Inc > Operator
View:
Post by patientriskyinvestor on Aug 30, 2013 3:11pm

Operator

Yes it does matter who is operator.  They control where you drill, people you hire to drill, data room, when you need to release drill results and how the program proceeds.  YES the costs are shared, usually on a reimbursement basis, ie operator pays and non-operating partner reimburses.  BUT, each jv partner has varying rights depending on the exact wording of the jv agreement which I have never seen.  No two jv agreements are exactly the same.  That is why when I asked Ross McElroh why they had decided to wrap up the last winter program when they did, he said "it was still -15 up there and the ice was thick".  He said he wanted to continue to drill but "AMW wanted to stop at the end of the agreed number of drill holes".  I never confirmed if this was the case with a comment from AMW.  BUT, it is also VERY important to compile drill results at some time and get assays so that the data can be analyzed, models developed and updated and drilling concentrated on the most likely areas so that precious cash is not wasted drilling futile holes, or in areas that may not warrant drilling at this particular juncture.  So clearly this JV agreement like most jv's has limits on spending and drilling programs.  As always it is in the details.  BUT any major purchasing a 50% interest does NOT want to be in the passenger seat.  So once this summer drill program winds up, AMW is the more likely of the 2 as a takeover candidate for the next 2 years.  So be patient, if Dev and FCU want to consolidate, they need to do so at a "fair" price and on fair terms.  Time is on OUR side.  I do own FCU, but probably 85% AMW, 15% FCU b/c I trust AMW managment AND I think that they are underpriced relative to FCU.
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Aug 30, 2013 3:40pm
Funny how cost of drilling and preserving precious capital plays into decision making.  And where does the capital to operate come from?  It comes from financings which are a function of share price.  So why not merge with FCU, save money on planning and admistration, raise operating capital more cheaply with less dilution to shareholders, and drill the project out more quickly ...more  
Comment by BuyNNSellN on Aug 30, 2013 5:16pm
Maybe cause Amw rocks
Comment by losecash on Aug 30, 2013 8:22pm
What would the purpose be bridge. Dev has already hinted strongly that it would be sold. We would not save money or drill anything anymore. The project would be gone. That's why the merger is unlikely as it is. AMW shareholders would like to see more drilling not a quick sale.  AMW is not doing their best to delay the project as they are making sure their shareholders get the right deal.& ...more  
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Aug 30, 2013 10:34pm
@losecash - I have no reason not to believe that patientriskyinvestor spoke to McElroy personally and was told by him that AMW chose not to extend the winter 2012 program.  It's unfortunate because the winter program had a drilling success rate of over 80% and an extention would almost surely have proved up some additional pounds and the projects value.  As a shareholder I'd like ...more  
Comment by losecash on Aug 30, 2013 10:56pm
I dont disagree with that. I have stated several times that both companies are cashed up lets get 10 rigs up there now.
Comment by Horta on Aug 30, 2013 11:56pm
It is hard to tell what is going on right now because we don't have all the information.  Is AMW stalling the merger to keep their jobs?  Is FCU pushing the merger just to sell 100% PLS early?  Are they working together to fend off a possible takeover of either AMW or FCU?  I don't know but in the end I hope they drill as long as possible so that they can prove up the ...more  
Comment by Tarquin4 on Sep 01, 2013 11:08am
I believe if a major offers 10.00 a share for AMW it will be accepted, maybe even 8.50 would do it. Ants-in-his-pants Dev will be left sucking wind
Comment by $tarbuxxonPender on Sep 01, 2013 9:46am
Hey Bridge, how about spring was coming and the ice was melting and that ended the winter drill program. Been drinking too much FCU koolaid. Its BS that FCU guys are superior operators. Sour grapes because they have to hand over in the new year
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Sep 01, 2013 9:01pm
@$tarbuxxonPender - Go ahead and call riskypatientinvestor a liar then, but I have no reason to believe he isn't posting truthfully.  If you have evidence that contradicts the information riskypatientinvestor's received from McElroy than lets hear it.  I'm in this to make money, not make friends.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities