Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

EU SCHEER committee evaluation still ongoing

[zenvesting]

EU Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental, and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) meeting minutes from their 1/22 meeting are out. Not a lot to look into, but it should at least make it obvious that environmental risks of the 4 candidate markers will be considered. Here is all that was said in the minutes: - Scientific advice on safety, health and environmental risks associated with the use of four candidates for a common fiscal marker The Chair of the WG presented the draft opinion. The WG held 4 meetings and it prepared a draft evaluation of the four candidate fuel markers. The SCHEER requested additional information on exposure scenarios; deadline for submitting this information is end of January 2018. The next meeting of the working group is taking place on 9 February 2018.

[kidl2]

Zen: Wow, you are really stuck. Aren’t you? You now pin your hopes on an environmental risks  in spite of all the evidence that SICPA is no longer a serious contender?

[Raptorman2013]

SICPA has a great chance to get the contract, KIDL. Stop your BS now - we are all sick of you...

[zenvesting]

Well actually, we know that all four candidate markers were advanced to SCHEER environmental risk evaluation, so baed on that, it seems apparent that SICPA is still a serious contender for the EU contract along with the other three competitors that all performed significantly better than the current solvent yellow.  You are also well aware that there are many other opportunities outside the

[kidl2]

Zen: EC tender ... I am sticking with what I said Jan 16. CM2, which is nott SICPA not being the leading contender simply based on cost and performance. Why all 4 were advance to Scheer is anyone’s guess. My personal guess, it’s “politics”, “procedure”, call it whatever you want. It should also be noted that these tests were conducted using systems you consider “dangerous”. The fact that the EC