Post by
GETaLONG on May 27, 2021 10:55am
I must be getting jaded and I'm certainly not a geologist,
but "thick intervals" ??? Heck, of a 'spin'. Don't get me wrong... I'm a BIG fan/$mall investor of FMC, but it sounds like another coat of 'lipstick' was used for this Press Release.
Comment by
KnaveofDiamonds on May 27, 2021 11:17am
Agreed GETaLONG. These results are not good results by any means. Copper mine is 0.6% avg on the absolute low end and you need a lot of ore grading at that threshold to even consider a mineable deposit. Huge miss for Forum and Rio Tinto here during this exploration program. The numerous 0.2% grades that are so commonly reported are far, far from mineable.
Comment by
mrburns on May 29, 2021 1:11am
i think $RIO.L would have stopped working Janice Lakel IF the results gathered so far were poor grades- but they're going back in June (next week). IMHO FMC is optomistic because $RIO.L is paying for the ride and it's district scale.
Comment by
mrburns on May 30, 2021 2:42pm
We forget that Saskatchewan is a politcally stable Tier 1 mining jurisdiction. eg. https://www.mining.com/drc-concentrate-export-ban-may-tighten-global-copper-cobalt-supply/
Comment by
mrburns on May 31, 2021 4:26pm
on CEO.CA @greenanon is confident copper grades are good (for RIO) https://ceo.ca/fmc?094578e627d9
Comment by
KnaveofDiamonds on Jun 08, 2021 11:49am
Please explain how the copper grade results are good. I have reviewed these results and must be missing something....