Denison interested in, GRD ?
Should GRD have an ( S ) added on ?
Grounded radioactive dolomite and shales ?
lol
Denison is a uranium miner.
Saskatchewan is reknown for, uranium.
Duperow Aquifer - has multiple minerals ( not just lithium )
Duperow Aquifer - has dolomitic and shale lithology.
Uranium loves to harbor in such geology.
Uranium can bond to many minerals. ( lattice or compound bonding )
Lead, Magnesium, Boron / Barites, Potassium, Phosphorus, etc...
Even, lithium.
GRD TECH REPORT Pf 31
The Computershare Permit allows GLC to conduct certain geological work and exploration operations on the affected Computershare lands, granted under the Computershare Permit. As GLC conducts these operations, it earns the ability to convert land under the Computershare
Permit into individual industrial subsurface mineral leases (each such lease shall hereinafter be referred to as a “Computershare Mineral Lease”) which, in turn, provides GLC
the right to exploit the minerals discovered. The Computershare Permit and each Computershare Mineral Lease thereafter are bound by confidentiality provisions by all parties. As a result, no specifics relating to mineral tenure attributes (term, work commitments, rent, royalties) have been disclosed within this report.
Obligations under both the Computershare Permit and each Computershare Mineral Lease are customary and standard practices in transactions of this nature in resource development, whether on Crown or freehold mineral lands.
GLC holds a 100% working interest, with no additional encumbrances except for Crown
lessor royalties. As previously noted, each Crown Permit provides
GLC with the exclusive right to explore for industrial minerals (e.g., lithium) by complying with certain mineral obligations.
Page 40
As the drill bit penetrates the subsurface, a series of down-hole tools record measurements while drilling (MWD), which are then collected and transmitted/processed at surface. Data relating to drilling variables such as weight on bit (WOB) and the associated rate of penetration (ROP) provide general insights relating to the strata being penetrated. Typically, softer lithologies such as shale, carbonates and evaporites require limited WOB to achieve an overall high ROP.
Page 41
Cores are brought to the surface and transported
intact, to laboratories for testing. Visual core inspection, and associated laboratory tests, provide ground-truth for open-hole well log correlation,
in addition to providing geologists the means of identifying key attributes pertaining to depositional environments, including fossils and sedimentary structures. Conventional core analysis includes the accurate measurement of porosity, permeability, and fluid
saturations. Industry standard porosity versus permeability cross-plots allow for quick look comparison of reservoir versus non-reservoir portions intersected by the core.
Page 42 (
just porosity testing or.... radio signals detecting isotopes ? )
Geologists and geophysicists gain key insights relating to the rock via open-hole logs thereby allowing them to gain an accurate assessment and delineate attributes, associated within zones of interest, including depth, thickness, lithology, porosity, and fluid saturation.
Open-hole logging tools have significantly evolved over time since the first well was logged in 1927. Conventional logging tools including
gamma ray, induction, density/neutron, and sonic logs provided a detailed assessment of every meter penetrated by the wellbore.
As a result of the variable lithologies observed within the Duperow, including reservoir quality limestone and dolomite intervals, non-reservoir carbonate muds, and evaporites, conventional raw log analysis is ineffective in accurately accessing total pore volume within the Duperow. Open-hole density-neutron porosity logs often provide the most accurate means of estimating ultimate pore volume.
Page 49 Nomanclanture ( assigning a name to the lithology )
Chart showing lithology
What stood out ?
The line graph -
could this be.... radio isotope signals for each strata ? LINK
https://groundedlithium.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/115092.GroundedLithium.FinalReportRev1.pdf Idustry Standard
using Neutron Gamma Lithology Density Testing -
Bulk Density Response and Experimental Study of
Pulsed Neutron-Gamma Density Logging
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.803775/full
Duperow Aquifer ( GOV'T )
Page 2 chart ( gamma and neutron values
https://geoconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/abstracts/2023/91570-spatial-distribution-of-lithium-in-saline-brines.pdf
Dendiry is importsnt.
Heaverier the mineral = more dense
Depleted Uranium = Lead
Atomic structures of heavy minerals ( can ) demonstrate attributes of hosting
more ( protons, neutrons, electrons )
Are GRD's claims overlapping claims ?
Suppose ( hypothetically ) Denison were interested in - uranium with in aquifers,
Junior would know this right ...?
Why would a uranium company team with a lithium ?
Biggie ?
Has GRD or Denison applied for ( uranium rights over leased lands ) ?
My assumptive post could be close to bullseye or... maybe distant,
but... just maybe these press captions shed more light ?
Denison may also provide further capital during the earn-in period to finance other activities as necessary to drive the overall KLP value, such as further technical evaluations and studies, drilling, sampling, and expenditures to maintain the KLP lands in good standing.
Brine extraction also has many similarities to the in situ recovery mining method that the company has successfully validated for use at its flagship Wheeler River uranium project in Northern Saskatchewan.
https://www.stockwatch.com/News/Item/Z-C!GRD-3502472/C/GRD
Post is not investment advice.
Simply trying to reason out why Denison would be interested in lithium.
Would giving up 75% control of lithium work the same as Denison giving
GRD 75% of uranium in brines, if found ?
Wink....lol