Post by
HIT2020 on Mar 09, 2020 9:39am
Anyone hear what the vote results were?
Well it appears we have another example of the creation of a Canadian Security which simply had to follow the administrative requirements in order for its management and others to get away with pilfering millions from shareholders.
What good are public service regulators/enforcement if they practice deliberate indifference even in the presence of blatant oppressive and/or bad faith practices of management against corporate security/share holders? What good is any system which requires victims to expose themselves to further risk in order to prove their case without equally valuable reward for doing so?
Once again we see a public services/disservice system (Court Orders granting agreement) which by design fails to proactively provide public protection. It appears we could be better off privately regulating the management of our wealth. IMO