Harte Gold Corp. HRTFF

Court order

[Fredfudpucker00]

At fti site the initial order for CCAA protection ,endorsement of Justice Pattillo see file. It mentions Sherman Estate. Does this mean Sherman's owned part of Harte?

[bufordpusser]

hey fred, that mine sits on leased claims, how is that going to work? if you look on a map all the surrounding claims are harte owned except where the mine is.

[Fredfudpucker00]

Buford, did you read my post? I can't understand how your post relates to mine . Read the copy of the file/direction/order(yellow copy hand written by judge) on FTI consulting site. I never said the Sherman Estate owned any claims ,but they could have money involved. Maybe the wording is just legal jargon. Buy the way the Sherman Estate owned property in Wawa,and it tied up RedPines

[bufordpusser]

fred, I was just asking about the mine sitting on leased claims. I am curios how leased claims are treated in a bankruptcy. sorry for the confusion.

[Fredfudpucker00]

Buford, as seen on FTI  , SLR new offer now will honour Appian's off take agreements and royalty. They will honour First Nation agreements. This tells me they will honour leased claims as I see it.

[bufordpusser]

pg, 58-59 0n this pdf file Sugar_Zone_Expansion_FS_01012021.pdf "On 31 January 1995, Harte Gold acquired the majority of the unpatented mining claims comprising the Sugar Zone Property from John E. Ternowesky, Lloyd Halverson, Ernie Beaven, Eino Ranta, Omer L. Belisle, and Peter Nabigon. Harte Gold subsequently entered into an Option and Joint Venture Agreement with Corona Gold Corporation

[Fredfudpucker00]

Buford, I believe Harte bought out most of Corona Gold,leaving Corona with 10% of shares of Harte many years ago. These shares have transferred to Osisko mining due to company takeovers. As seen on FTI site, Osisko mining is shown in the service list as of Dec.14  2021. If you look at Osisko Gold Royalty you will see a William Murray John as a director. Read his bio.,and see the connection

[kitsune1]

Its just legalese -- the way judges and lawyers refer to precedence. IANL, but I think the judge is syaing that the request for sealing the EX AA meets the criteria established in the rulling on "Sherman estate" case where the SC  established some principles on "sealing orders".