Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum La Mancha Resources Inc LACHF

GREY:LACHF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by RedHorizon on Jan 11, 2009 1:19am

Book Value

My calculation of LMA's book value as of 9/30/08 is:

$97.38M/142M shares = 68.5 cents Canadian.  This is more than a double from here (30 cents as of this writing).

For a cash flow positive gold miner with 3 operating mines to be trading at less than 50% of book value is a tremendous value.  It is also important to note that they have $9 million in cash and do not need additional financing at this point in time.  Disclosure:  I own this stock and I am glad that I do.

Best wishes to all.
Comment by Nergy on Jan 11, 2009 11:17am
Good point Red Horizon and looking at the book value per share is probably the most unfavourable valuation method for La Mancha. A NPV, P/CF or Oz/MCAP would all be more favourable for La Mancha in comparison with all other producing gold companies I’m familiar with.  Let’s use the most solid major, Kinross Gold corp. as a comparison company. Kinross trades currently at 21.14 ...more  
Comment by RedHorizon on Jan 11, 2009 2:45pm
NERGY:I agree that looking at price to book is the least favorable to LMA.  That's what I think is so interesting, that by any measure we can come up with LMA will be severely undervalued.  Here's another comparison which is telling.Both LMA and Western Goldfields have a cost of production of $500 per ounce.  WGW recently reported better numbers than that but are saying that ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities