Post by
edrose on Apr 02, 2020 4:21pm
Regulators didn’t find anything wrong since our previous
Board agreed to terms and conditions letting thomvest exercise the clause that enabled them to demand full payment for all unearned interest only few months after they signed the agreement
with th this extra roughly 100 million they got extra 30 % of Pli when they declared hardship.
If I remember this question was raised at last agm to Galbraith and he didn’t answer the question except said it was complicated
I wonder what he will say under oath and why they wrote off ivig for 150 million we never got an answer
if someone knows how to post audio of agm they should you can also hear best squirming on question re closing atm only few months after they approved it he looked and someone in front row for answer and said it was the law they had no choice IF IT WAS THE LAW WHY DID THEY APPROVE IT FEW MONTHS BEFORE
Comment by
GoBBs on Apr 02, 2020 5:43pm
They'll all probably pizz their pants under oath because they didn't think the rightful owners of the company could do anything about about it. Oops, wrong, bad assumption.