Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."

GREY:LSTMF - Post Discussion

Lightstream Resources Ltd. > definately uncertain. Shareholders obviously get nothing.
View:
Post by reefsandals4eva on Jan 22, 2017 3:29pm

definately uncertain. Shareholders obviously get nothing.

https://www.mccarthy.ca/pubs/CCAA_as_an_M&A__Article_(Taplin).pdf
Comment by afficheholderon on Jan 22, 2017 3:58pm
definately uncertain, what do you mean by that, reefsandals4eva?
Comment by wizthewiz on Jan 22, 2017 4:41pm
Thank you for the link. So who, if anyone is obligated to explain definitively and in plain language to the shareholders and other stakeholders what they can expect to receive from this transaction?
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 22, 2017 5:09pm
an accountant would be the best bet. the monitor's report made it pretty clear they're not accountants. We're all minority shareholders so unless the asset purchase agreement only went through because of what the proposal agreement was, in my opinion the only thing protecting shareholders is the court system. With all that being said, I wouldn't want to bet against the shareholders ...more  
Comment by Pancho2 on Jan 22, 2017 7:39pm
Plain language. The Ad Hoc Committee and the Company made a Support Agreement (13/07/16) to sell the Company ( included an offer for old Shareholders to receive 2.25%  of the  new restructured Company) under the CBCA The Unsecured Noteholders did not agreed to what was offered to them, so the  Ad Hoc Committee made a Credit Bid under the CCAA . The Credit Bid was the same ...more  
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 22, 2017 7:58pm
I agree with you, but there's one question I have for you that I can't find the answer to. In the agreement shareholders voted on wasn't there warrants to buy? How would you do that if the company that purchased LTS is private? Maybe what you're saying is that 2.25 percent is what we are getting and there will be no warrants to buy and the shareholder vote is no longer important ...more  
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 22, 2017 8:24pm
@pancho2 I just re-read it (july 16 2016 news release) I think I just figured it out for myself, Those warrants to buy would already be into the money, so they'd just pay them out?
Comment by wizthewiz on Jan 23, 2017 12:03am
Thank you. The original agreement ws for 2.25 and warrants if I remember correctly?
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 12:26am
You're forgetting the 7.75 percent of series 2 warrants exercisable between 12.88 and 14.96. They also say they're issuing 100million shares as opposed to 198000.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities