Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."

GREY:LSTMF - Post Discussion

Lightstream Resources Ltd. > @wizthewiz go to Reports ,third monitor report pg10&11
View:
Post by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 12:34am

@wizthewiz go to Reports ,third monitor report pg10&11

https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/Lightstream/default.htm
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 12:34am
The unsecured have been bought out. not coming with the new company.
Comment by Pancho2 on Jan 23, 2017 1:30am
Thanks Reefs, I have not read that report, but they mentioned in the Q3 2016 Balance Sheet report  that the Liabilities subject to compromise was $1,337,015. Showing the Secured and Unsecured Noteholders as one total, meant that  the Secured was offering to buy out the Unsecured. So the old Shareholders will get 2.25 % of the 100M shares in the new  restructured Company (Ridgeback ...more  
Comment by Oldfart74 on Jan 23, 2017 8:31am
You haven't read the latest report of the Receiver but you have no trouble in spouting nonsense from old reports.  If you take the time to read the court order approving sale of assets and the motion materials, you would know that the only shareholders of Ridgeback will be the holders of the secured notes.  The pr rata comment means that if you own 10% of the secured notes, you will ...more  
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 9:07am
dissenting shareholders don't get "nothing" they get what they were offered for their shares. the secured are "out of the money" quoted from the third monitors report , the end of pg 10 and the beginning of pg 11
Comment by BluSky23 on Jan 23, 2017 8:35am
I have read all of the documents, and the way I see it is that the SH's can not receive cash as the unsecured need to be paid in full before a dollar trickles to us SH's....and that is not happening. The only language that gives me hope I that the shares will be distributed to 'beneficial owners' of the secured debt. My hope is that the court made the SH's a beneficial owner ...more  
Comment by Oldfart74 on Jan 23, 2017 8:57am
Read the documents.  How can shareholders be beneficial owners of secured debt?  They are shareholders.
Comment by BluSky23 on Jan 23, 2017 9:39am
The court through the negotiations can do anything they wish. All I am saying is that this is the only way I see benefit coming to the SH's. Other than that, the way I read it SH's are SOL.
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 9:52am
I don't think so. The company is still a going concern. with everything I've read it's restored a bit of confidence in it. The steps they took back in July is why it moved so quickly, in my opinion. The news release in july was the reason the asset purchase agreement didn't have to have a shareholder vote.
Comment by BluSky23 on Jan 23, 2017 9:58am
Sorry Reefs, but you keep going back to July. In the purchase agreement, one condition was that the support agreement was maintained and in full effect. Meaning unsecured and SHs are cut out due to fact of not supporting at special meetings. I agree it BS that shareholders got no opportunity. The SHs don't need to approve purchase in CCAA, court acts on their behalf.
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 10:08am
that is correct courts can act on their behalf but it's still a going concern. You NEED to read the third monitors report. It clearly says the unsecured are being paid, in my opinion. it says they are "out of the money" that is a term that you should type into Investopedia. Dissenting shareholder are not given "nothing" they are able to opt out of the company for what they ...more  
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 10:21am
What special meetings? there was no meeting. There was no vote.
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 8:58am
in my opinion you keep making a mistake in your thinking. You seem to think this is a bankruptcy. The company is still a going concern. Shareholders are not last to get paid because it's not a bankruptcy, the 43 page document I posted actually explains why they aren't allowed to stop a restructuring of a company. Air Canada Corp has a very similar case in which shareholders were left out ...more  
Comment by Oldfart74 on Jan 23, 2017 9:15am
The July document has no relevance.  When there unable to get unsecured note holders onside, it died.  This entire process is now being managed by the September 26 initial court order.  That is the actual date this restructuring started.  Go to FTI website.  Nothing before September 26
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 9:18am
The secured and unsecured can not stop the restructuring once it's in CCAA, it did not die. That was a new bill that passed recently, as soon as it went to CCAA secured didn't need anyone's vote, that's why there was no meeting.
Comment by reefsandals4eva on Jan 23, 2017 9:36am
What I meant to say, The shareholders and unsecured can not stop the restructuring once it is in CCAA, bill C-47 if I remember correct. The minority shareholders can not stop a restructuring of a company once it is in CCAA because in most cases it doesn't benefit anyone, The secured get paid in full in a bankruptcy so if they take a loss the minority shareholders don't have the right to ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities