Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lantronix Inc LTRX

Lantronix, Inc. is a global provider of compute and connectivity Internet of Things (IoT) solutions that target industries, including smart cities, automotive and enterprise. Its portfolio is organized into three primary product lines: Embedded IoT Solutions, IoT Systems Solutions, and Software and Services. Its portfolio of embedded products provides a comprehensive range of options, including... see more

NDAQ:LTRX - Post Discussion

Lantronix Inc > How is Intrinsyc business doing ?
View:
Post by zario on May 14, 2020 9:28pm

How is Intrinsyc business doing ?

I just read the conference call transcript for the LTRX third quarter financial results. I am wondering how it is going for the "Intrinsyc" business unit (if I can say).

1) revenues of less than $5M

The last time Intrinsyc had this low level of sales was in September 2017. That looks like a huge drop from over $6M in September 2019.

2) it looks like Qualcomm had some concerns (see the text in bold).

3) For M. Pickle, it's like the main source of customers for ex-Intrinsyc products are former Lantronix customers (see the text in bold)

4) M. Pickle seems to want to minimize the importance of Qualcomm as the technology providers for the ex-Intrinsyc solutions.  I understand what he is saying but why he feels the necessity to say that in the context of a discussion specific to Intrinsyc?

 

Am I seeing too much to this?

What do you think?

 

Zario

 

________________

 

Richard Valera

 

And then just on Intrinsyc, so congratulations on the close of that. And it sounds like it contributed meaningfully and we had kind of thought that would be something probably in the range of $5.5 million to $6 million in the quarter. Can you confirm if that’s kind of in the range of what it contributed in the quarter?

 

Paul Pickle

 

No. Substantially, while we – I shouldn’t say substantially south of $5 million, but it was between $4 million and $5 million.

 

Richard Valera

 

Got it. So can you just talk about the dynamics of that business. Obviously, Qualcomm historically a very significant customer there and certainly, I’m sure still is. Can you just talk about kind of how that businesses, as well as how any non-Qualcomm initiatives you have going on of Intrinsyc or going into sort of growth prospects of that business?

 

Paul Pickle

 

The Qualcomm, I would call them more of a technology partner, rather than customer. We don’t – we purchase products from Qualcomm and then we feed those into our hardware-based solutions that we’ve developed software on top of and then sell that to our customer base.

 

The Qualcomm relationship is going great. We’ve had several meetings, where we’re stepping up our engagement. We’ve had some requests from them that – in terms of better penetration geographically and other areas that we’re certainly trying to make sure that we we address those concerns. And overall, I think, right as they’re starting to launch the 865 processor, it’s really been – this is kind of an exciting time. We’ve got a natural flow of customers that have used products from us before and are looking to kind of step up and use a piece of hardware with more capabilities.

 

Not to mention we’re – in terms of development, I think that we’re at the very forefront of when it comes to hardware development kits availability. So we expect to capture a lot of that early interest. So that’s going fairly well.

 

In terms of other engagements, I’ve said it before, I’ll say it now. Certainly, the Qualcomm relationship, I don’t want to disparage that at all, because it’s really important to us. But we do take a bit of a technology as agnostic approach. We obviously want to leverage our core competencies wherever we can when we’re trying to develop a customer solution.

 

But what we – what technologies we embrace really kind of comes down to that problem statement that the customer has and what is the optimum solution and it could be a number of different things. So we are looking to make sure that we have a broad base of capabilities with which we address those problems.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4347757-lantronix-inc-ltrx-ceo-paul-pickle-on-q3-2020-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single

 

Comment by humppyus on May 15, 2020 12:17pm
Remember the deal didn't close until mid January or so.  It wasn't a full quarter with Intrinsyc's contribution.  Paul's comments re QCOM seemed to downplay things a little, however he may have had other reasons for that.  Either way the market seems to be cheering LTRX today.  Up nicely on good volume.  They appear to be in the right space given the ...more