Post by
zeus55 on Jun 26, 2013 2:46pm
Looks like I was right
With the release of the dividend and the completion of the loan agreement in the same news release, it does appear that I was 100% correct that the two were directly linked, in spite of claims from everyone else to the contrary.
On the positive side, it does appear that the bank is satisfied that Mart can afford to pay the dividend, while using the bank line to fund capex.
On the negative side, it is odd that the share price is going nowhere.
Curious.
Comment by
Treetop2 on Jun 26, 2013 3:42pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
zeus55 on Jun 26, 2013 3:52pm
Then why was the dividend delayed, and why were the two in the same news release?
Only the ignorant ignore the obvious.
Only the stupid stick their heads in the sand.
Comment by
zeus55 on Jun 26, 2013 4:45pm
Hmmm, I couldn't make up anything that utterly stupid.
I said nothing of the kind, and for you to suggest I did is pathetic to the extreme.
"the bank holds a gun to Wade's head and Mart only gets the secured loan if they pay the dividend?"
Are you on some kind of drugs?
Comment by
zeus55 on Jun 26, 2013 11:55pm
Your stupidity is beyond response.
How does one put an idiot on ignore with this new format?