Post by
Fernando2010 on Aug 25, 2013 8:54am
Question about tax benefit contributions
From 2012 Financial statements (note 22):
"For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company recorded $10.6 million of tax benefit contributions. This represents the Company’s costs relating to the tax incentives granted to Mart’s co-venturers with respect to the petroleum operation at the Umusadege field. The payment of the tax benefit contributions will cease upon the expiry of the tax incentives period in 2014. There were no equivalent charges in 2011."
Is there any reasonable explanation for this item? It doesn´t seem a legal obligation, but rather a payment generated as a result of some kind of agreement with our local partners regarding the tax incentives. It looks like Mart is obligated to pay to their partners the difference between the tax rate absent any incentive (65%) and the tax rate as a result of that incentive (30%). But I´m not sure on this.
Any comments?
Thanks in advance
Fernando
Comment by
zeus55 on Aug 26, 2013 9:46am
Well Fernando, 155 people read your question, and not one of the "experts" even tried to respond. That sure says a lot about those who love to post their rubbish here. But I hope you found my inbox helpful.
Comment by
elaine0356 on Aug 26, 2013 7:18pm
A very good piece of information: https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=12706&mn=6567&pt=msg&mid=13072634
Comment by
wallywill on Aug 26, 2013 10:59pm
Sorry there is a typo mistake in my previous post. It was 2012 Mart recorded a 10.6 million tax benefit. Regards Wally