Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

OTCPK:MAUXF - Post Discussion

Mart Resources Inc > Holy balls Wally
View:
Post by zeus55 on Aug 26, 2013 11:08pm

Holy balls Wally

"In 2013 for 6 months up to June, the company recieved 1 million"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The tax benefit contributions are not income, they are expenses.
Comment by zeus55 on Aug 26, 2013 11:36pm
The same guy who was dead wrong about UMU-11. Must be a CFA.
Comment by wallywill on Aug 27, 2013 12:55am
Unbelievable! Who ever said it was income?????  Fernado asked about the Tax benefit contributions and I answered his question. You are once again spewing BS. Oh by the way, I was 100 % right about UMU-11 Tax Benefit Contributions In Q2 2013 the Company recorded $0.4 million (Q2 2012: $2.8 million) of tax benefit contributions. This represents the Company's costs relating to the tax ...more  
Comment by zeus55 on Aug 27, 2013 6:13pm
Well Wally, you said "It was 2012 Mart recorded a 10.6 million tax benefit", and that Mart "received" 1 million in 2013 so far. So it was your sloppy posting that caused the confusion. But no, you were dead wrong about UMU-11. You said that the last attempt was only the second, while in fact it was the third. No big deal, but why cause confusion?
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities