Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

OTCPK:MAUXF - Post Discussion

Mart Resources Inc > Post Umugini financial performance
View:
Post by mjh9413 on Dec 07, 2014 6:23pm

Post Umugini financial performance

Last qtr ~8,000 boepd resulted in $33MM cash flow at ~$110 average realised price. So, taking a potential of 16,000 boepd  as a marker (as we have less lost oil and increasing flows of oil from field) at a $70 realised price should give about $45MM to $48MM cash flow on same share count. So,immediately  running faster to compensate for lower price this is a position that not many oil companies are in...facing a drastic price collapse we have a unique positive occurring in this company...and with Notore and its existing co-venturers, with both gas and oil, pioneer tax status on the new field, and all its reserve and prodn potential, at these levels MMT IS a steal. But JMHO
Comment by righand2 on Dec 07, 2014 6:49pm
How do you come up with that result? $33 million of cash flow at 8000boed means they got about $45/bbl netbacks. Subtract $40, and what do you get?
Comment by neugrufti on Dec 08, 2014 10:21am
You do know that netback isn't a flat calculation, so you don't just see a $40 drop in realized price and subtract $40 from the nebtack, right?
Comment by mjh9413 on Dec 08, 2014 2:11pm
The easiest way to define the benefit of more oil flowing (and less lost oil) to the export terminals is to say, okay, 8,000 boepd cost $28MM in the qtr and since the increase to 16,000 has only marginal increase on costs (mainly because real average daily prodn capability is already 12,000 boepd and MMT is ready to open flows from exisiting wells), that cost is spread amongst twice the level of ...more  
Comment by vestor111 on Dec 09, 2014 7:50am
It is difficult to say where and how long things will "stablize".      Tight Oil in the US is largely over leveraged which is hammering the junk credit market - which will dry up capital needed to roll forward production with more drilling.  November drilling permits were reportedly off 40%.    Tight Oil depletion rates are epic.   So between depletion ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities