Post by
thedoc7 on Feb 27, 2015 9:06pm
canadian dollars
Is the1395 canadian dollars that would make it 1115 us for allin costs
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 9:13pm
yes, they report in can$.
This press release should be read in conjunction with Metanor's quarterly financial statements and accompanying notes and the related Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), which can be found at www.metanor.ca or on SEDAR www.sedar.com. All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.
Comment by
CanWllSttJr on Feb 27, 2015 9:21pm
sorry man.. but even with all in cost at 1395, average gold sales at 1405.. a +10$ per ounce.. they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter....
Comment by
LiTeOn1981 on Feb 27, 2015 10:18pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
LiTeOn1981 on Feb 27, 2015 10:12pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.
Comment by
wind00 on Feb 27, 2015 10:05pm
you said.... "they were 3.7 millions negative for the Q4 2014... for 1 quarter...." yes.... and 3 million was depreciation, not an operating loss. so 3 million should be taken out of that loss, leaving around 800.000. loss. check the facts please. still a loss, but it can be dealt with. HELLOOOOOOOO!!!!! that is my opinion.