Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum MGM Energy Corp MGMCF

GREY:MGMCF - Post Discussion

MGM Energy Corp > Another devolution article
View:
Post by bypp on Dec 10, 2013 10:29am

Another devolution article

https://blogs.platts.com/2013/12/09/nw-territories/
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 12, 2013 11:06am
The only thing that will move a junior oil stock up and have it stay up is product going down a pipe to market. MGM will still be 15 cents next year and the next and the next all the news in the world means nothing. Take the tax losss and move on.
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 12, 2013 3:31pm
Deals will be made and money will be spent and SP's will climb, it has nothing to do with production in the short term.
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 12, 2013 6:49pm
thats right. its just mindless gambling pumped and promoted by stock brokers on these web sites. in the end the retail investor is the sucker. if you want to play this game sell when ever it goes up a few pennies. a person can follow these cons around the venture exchange and actually make money but these companies with no production like mgm engery been around 7 years and not a cent made and no ...more  
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 13, 2013 7:33am
you are entitled to your opinion for sure. here are my positives on MGM: 1-they have almost 1 TCF of gas already discovered and waiting on a pipeline decision.  These large reserves are ideal for LNG exports since they are big delivery wells that can supply lots of gas over a long time without constatnly drilling more and more wells as in shale gas. 2-the nat gas in the Mckensie will be ...more  
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 9:03am
Everything you say is true and well researched. But I heard the same thing about the Mackenzie valley and the Canadian arctic in the 1970's and the 1980's and now. I can imagine how stupid it would have been for me to have invested money into this area in the 1970's it would be the same as having buried money in a grave or throwing it in a black hole. Why tie up cash in MGM when you ...more  
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 13, 2013 10:23am
Just imagine what would have transpired if shale NG had not existed, we'd have a MVP pipeline already, and MGX would be a large producer of central McKenzie NG and I can guarantee our SP would be in the $5-10 range if not more. one day in the future as these shale fields are depleted or it gets very expensive to drill these wells and they need 10-20 /mcf gas prices to make them economic, we ...more  
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 10:41am
I have a lot of mgm I started buying it at $5.80 and have quit a bit of the stock. I can afford to hold it and if need be take a tax loss. I too am waiting for the pipeline decision on Dec 20 if its a go then we are in the money if its a no go sucks to be us. I would not recommend this stock to anyone that can't afford to tie up their money for at least 10 years.
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 13, 2013 10:50am
yes i agree on your 10 year time horizon but it could come much quicker than that as well, it all depends on many different scenarios that are currently being played out. GL to MGM'er  we need a break for sure
Comment by bypp on Dec 13, 2013 11:00am
What exactly does this meeting on the 20th entail?
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 13, 2013 12:31pm
I'm no expert and I don't have the details in front of me and it's been a while since I got an update, but since the MVP already has most of the government approvals and everything is ready to go except the proponents, they have to decide if they are going to preceed with the build of the MVP or not. I'm not sure what happens if they decide to delay or decide to never build the ...more  
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 1:20pm
This play is not ecomonical at all at this time and Imperial would be dumb wasting money on it. However that being said the Canadian Government wants this they want the ecomonical progress in the north they want to assert Canadian sovereignty in the north right to the pole. They also want at least one pipeline to start to show Canada is serious about getting its oil and gas to overseas markets ...more  
Comment by shambano1 on Dec 13, 2013 2:49pm
if the decision is a good forward decision then MGX will not be at 0.16 cents next week, so this long term stock that is going to take 10 yerars to make shareholders some money will be moving up considerably. sure it will takie years to build the pipeline but just buidling it means that you can figure out a price for their resoruces even if it's 5-7 years down the road since it will developed ...more  
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 3:03pm
My guess is .40 then profit taking then back to .40 then about a dollar in 18 months .  It will not be a bunch of dirt shirt low pay punk stock brokers pumping this project it will be the Canadian government.
Comment by HobsAZ on Dec 13, 2013 2:17pm
I would say John in Calgary already sold for a tax loss and is a liittle concerned.  If not take your tax loss and move on.   I call BS on  
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 2:24pm
What broker you working for? You guys are panicing you are all going to get stuck with this junk and guys like me warn the retail investors about your pump and dump scams.