Kontrol Technologies Corp N.KNR

is canada 20 minutes behind US...?

[yearninyank]

Or do they sort of suck at this being on time thing? Can't believe this pompous jerk. Thanks for wasting a chunk of my day Ghezzi.

[BalledEagle]

Not sure what time zone you're in but in Quebec, the conference call started at 16:30 flat

[yearninyank]

I was being sarcastic. I sat on the call from 1:30 (US PST) until 1:50 listening to hold music. I can't imagine you had anything but hold music at 4:30 flat as you say. So to my way of thinking that self important twit made us all wait 20 minutes for nothing. Or is there actually a different explanation for the delay I experienced? In any case it seems another moment of enthusiasm based on

[DD34]

The call started exactly on time you scamming liar.

[Rogg47]

Coming from you, not very credible!!! Loll 

[wilander]

Wow yearning.  you have lost your nut.  it was at 4:30 without a hitch. Seeing everyone heard it but you.....dunno what else to say. Other can you just proved you actually are crazy?

[Edcando]

Yeah I was surprised it started exactly on time (like as the clock was changing on my truck 

[canyousayiii]

The call started at 4:30 and ended at 4:50, after there were no further questions following the two analysts. Hard to believe nobody had any questions, so maybe there were no further questions from any analysts, the peanut gallery doesn't count. So, I would like to see what the two analysts are going to crank out. Some good answers to tough questions could have me recommend the stock to folk I

[DD34]

A year ago on this call he answered Retail callers and it was a joke because of the scammers around this stock. Big Leagues are the goal no need to give the 2k shareholder a voice when institutions and analysts are joining now. If you have a question call the company.

[canyousayiii]

DuDe34, not everybody you don't like is a scammer. You claimed at the beginning of 2021 that KNR was going to report a ridiculously high cash position, JF challenged you a few times with facts about the previous quarter suggesting it was not possible, yet even with factual rationale you steadfastly stuck to it as if you had information otherwise. You were waaaay off of course. You showed

[DD34]

Not everyone is a scammer but a few of you make it obvious. Plus IP addresses make it easy to confirm.

[canyousayiii]

So, are you going to answer why you steadfastly stuck to a statement when reasonable evidence suggested that it was impossible? Just stubbornness and extremely poor judgment and analytical skills, that probably define most of your opinions, or wanting to create an illusion of something better than it was? Which one of the two better describes you?