Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nickel Creek Platinum Corp NCPCF


Primary Symbol: T.NCP

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and evaluation of nickel and platinum group metals (PGM) mineral properties in North America. Its flagship asset is its 100%-owned nickel-copper PGM project, located in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Nickel Shaw Project). The project is in the... see more

TSX:NCP - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Nov 19, 2023 6:48am

- THOUGHTS -

    Screen Shot - 2023 PFS
1 - Main Wellgreen shows no - A, B conditions.
2 - Burwash has A, B conditions.
3 - Why were FE 1, FE2,  Quill,  created  ( Yukon -  Park - Provincial / Federal ? )
4 - PFS only shows Quill location - no details - google map Quill falls in dark green area

PFS claims map ( left image )
Main Wellgreen has - No - A, B conditions, all white - then....
why only mine the upper geology nothing deep ?

Suppose the junior caught in the middle - drilling, advancing, showing
upper cores / lower cores to  (  Klaune + Fed, Provincial ? )
but why would boundaries change ?
they should remain static / fixed.

If Yukon Gov't + Klaune + White River Nations already made A, B, agreements
years ago, how is it QUILL has somehow squeezed in the land tenures of, Wellgreen ?
Even, FE 1, FE 2, Central, and West Zones have morphed.

Could the dark green on google maps be, Parklands ?
How about watershed mining boundaries ( ex - 75m distance from watersheds ) ?

If 2023 PFS main wellgreen map shows no conditions,
why only skim surface with pit models - nothing deep ?

Would it not suggest - shallows pit models = points to conditions ?

Quill never existed.
Main Wellgreen went right to dividing main access road.
What was existing aside of Burwash opposite side of dividing road ?
Kat, Linda claims.

   What's the smartest mine plan ?
- play with upper surface ores with practical entitlement / wrong extraction
  vast area, larger footprint mining ( with potential - A, B conditions )
  what else explains upper lower holes or zone changes ?
  especially Quill.


  versus

- run with an existing UG mine model. .
- since it's always existed could it skirt new conditions ?
- team with Fed, Provincial
- smaller UG mining ( pull exotics and plats ) model mining pouring Oz's $$$
- core highgrade UG mine inferred = 174 million tonnes
- Run more portals backside + quill = adds significant tonnage
- 800 chip samples all plats ( lots highgrade + Rh, Re increases Eq's = 5 - 10+ grams
- green areas, overlay - UG mine, Highgrade back side, Quill + base camp deep dip
- these are very deep zones - lots of tonnage in tight area
- rhodium hypothetical - 1/g tonne x 174 million tonnes
- yes... exotics are said to be sporadic but so were the... lab assay methods ( wink )
= cheap start up, pour Oz's target plats + exotics = maximum value.
= why was Quill added... who has dibs on this ?
= Quill is a cornerstone to = owning the deep tonnage

versus

Buy shareholders out.
Let, Fed, Provincial, Klaune, Stakeholders figure it out.


After thoughts ?
Spinning... trying to sort all the new information.
Just wish i knew why all the new boundary changes, who owns what.
Are shareholders being told all the details ?

If junior performed upper / lower holes + shallow pit models
that sort of points to, A, B condition - yet, 2023 PFS claims map shows no
A, B color zones.


Adding,  changing zones, upper / lower holes, assay methods, met tests, shallow pits
can shape a project to a specific preference right ?

Is each move advantageous for, shareholders ?
Still trying to figure it out.


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53340623987_a4508f7747_h.jpg


- Utilize UG mine - target plats + exotics + pour oz's  ( junior has exotic stats )
- JV with - FN or Feds with capital infusion without share dilution
- Sell and reward shareholders ( project has dragged with boundary goal post changes )


Ohhhh,
The precious and critical metals market.
Always complex.  Only in, Canada.  lol

My post is not investment advice.
As one can read... i'm striving to figure out the mysteries of, Wellgreen.

Boundaries
wouldn't be changing if another didn't think value was there.


Cheers...

Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities