Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Novadx Ventures Corp NDXFF

"NovaDx Ventures Corp is a mining company engaged in the exploration, development and recovery of coal. The company's operations are principally directed towards the Rex No."

GREY:NDXFF - Post Discussion

Novadx Ventures Corp > NDX wins court case re: permit #0080080
View:
Post by Kewl2 on Jan 03, 2012 8:04am

NDX wins court case re: permit #0080080

Financial Services; Novadx Wins in Alabama Court of Appeals

363 words

30 December 2011

Ecology, Environment & Conservation via VerticalNews.com

2011 DEC 30 - (VerticalNews.com) -- (TSX VENTURE:NDX) is pleased to announce that its wholly-owned subsidiary MCoal Corporation ("MCoal") jointly with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management ("ADEM") have again successfully defended the action by the Black Warrior River Keepers, Inc. and Friends of the Locust Fork, Inc. (the "Appellants") challenge to ADEM's 2009 issuance of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit N0. AL0080080 (the "Permit") to MCoal for operation of its Rosa mine in Blount County, Alabama.

On December 2, 2011, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals issued an order affirming, without opinion, the December 8, 2010 decision of the Alabama Circuit Court of Montgomery County in favour of MCoal and ADEM. As previously disclosed in the Company's news release of February 3, 2011, the Appellants had filed an appeal of the decision of the Montgomery Circuit Courts to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals.

As previously disclosed in the Company's news releases dated July 2, 2010, October 7, 2010, and December 16, 2010, the Appellants have commenced actions to contest the issuance of the Permit on two prior occasions without success.

On November 20, 2009, the Appellants filed their initial petition for a hearing to contest ADEM's action with the Alabama Environmental Management Commission ("AEMC") alleging ADEM had not followed proper rules and procedures in issuance of the Permit. MCoal voluntarily joined ADEM in its defense of this action. On June 25, 2010, the AEMC, by unanimous decision of the Commissioners, adopted the recommendation of its Administrative Law Judge and ruled in favor of ADEM's actions, affirming the Permit was validly issued.

The Appellants subsequently filed an appeal of the decision of the AEMC to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Alabama. MCoal voluntarily joined ADEM in its defense of this action. On December 8, 2010, Circuit Court Judge Charles Price ruled in favor of ADEM, affirming the AEMC's June 25, 2010 decision that the Permit was validly issued

Be the first to comment on this post