Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Patchh; what are the requirements if the warrants

[rockhound3]

were called early?

I have a few of these so am interested?

tx
Rock

[patchh]

I see where they can B called - Early..  Can they call these @ a loss...  probably not w majors holding.. this rversal is something new -2- this trader... Murdick Capp did a SNAP a couple weeks ago..  i hav a few warrants..  opened the board on monday/tue and these wts are up 153% @ the bell.. i.e. Open @ o.60 - Strike on Stok is 11.5..  Close of bell the Wt is 2.83

[westcoast1000]

What happens if the Jan warrants are called when the share price gets to .20? The warrant holders then must put up the .20 for each share purchase, surrender the warrant and no longer get the leverage available to them from the warrant structure after they have reached the strike price. Then they get their shares. However, the big warrant holders here are Pala. They would not do something that

[Notgnu]

We are also very close to another production update and, I am guessing, some visability on the May (AGM) share consolidation. Aslo the hedges are for about 715,000 pounds of copper per month for the first 6 months. Depending on grade and mill through-put this is likely about half or, toward the latter part, a third of our production. We still make money on it based on the $1.86 cost. I calculate

[patchh]

simpy don't kno...  these are swampy creatures..  i suspect if they call the wts early - they will hav to apply a premium.. why ?  avoid a higher stok price on the intrinsiv value of the warrants: trading into the common stok as the call options mature A + B = C + D  ::  the metric here is potentially communatative  ! this reversal is either null or

[westcoast1000]

I love to know what this message above says but it is unintelligible. There is no premium involved in calling the warrants in, IMHO. Once the strike price is hit, the company can state that the warrants be immediately exercized. That is it, as far as I know. Remember, this is not a call option, despite what is written above. A call means someone has to sell you a stock at a price. In this case

[Notgnu]

As SunTzu says in the 4th chapter on Maneuvre, "...warfare is based on deception. Move when it is advantageousand create changes in the situation by dispersal and concentration of forces." Line 12 in the B. Griffith translation N.

[patchh]

i get confused !  was he Han or Song Dynasty Mao..  there were a couple of Suns in the Mao period..  one got smoked by his side and the other lead the Communist Democraqtic Leauge

[Notgnu]

Easy to get con fuuused. More likely Wu or Zhou about (neg) 520.  N

[Notgnu]

Estimates (chapter 1.. 17/18)  "17. All warfare is based on deception." "18. Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity." N.

[patchh]

Wu & Zu would place it in the Quin Period..  Zong would B here - warring states period !  ~230 https://koreandrama.es/qin-dynasty-epic-part-1-2020 better known as the Water Margin/Romance of The Three Kingdoms Chairman Mao was from the Zong Clan and Mao's a Palace Official's.. Quin Alliance has to be watched using winkipedia..  Mao had Sun bumped off, in a palace

[Notgnu]

China was Polo vaulted out of semi world dominance (almost) arguably 800 to 200 years ago and are playing the long game. Mao was a distortion and distraction, an experiment gone bad. China is getting to close to power again and for the sake of the enlightenment and particularly the values of the French Revloution and the founding of American democracy by constitution, will, or may soon, need a

[Notgnu]

And yes, that slap back may wipe out 3/4 of the world population and sicken the rest if nnnnuuuuuks's are used. Maybe just a limited exchange and some EMP's with the entire global satelite networks disabled... then the demand for copper will be for bronze axe manufacturing again. N.

[patchh]

as to the 50 families runng the poltiburo in china..  all go bak to the han period and polo/kahn.. by the traditions of that period - Mao was a King

[Notgnu]

Sure but it is all a distraction from Ncu... all will be great despite the price of tea in China. N

[westcoast1000]

JUst to add to my last post: I do not know if it is gibberish that patchh writes sometimes. I just cannot translate it. My problem, I guess. 

[Arbourmark]

I agree with comments on Patch. I have said similar things that he/she speaks in riddles and generally spews nonsense. In regards to warrants he/she has no clue how warrants work. I have read comments that some are suggesting that the maturity date could be accelerated once the share price hits .20 cents for first warrants and .22 cents for the A warrants. I do not believe there is any

[westcoast1000]

Thanks, Mark.

[Notgnu]

I am more cynical than you Arb. (sorry patchh if I am wrong but...) I believe patchh is a version of a "subtle basher" who tries to build a specious version of credibility by sowing subtle confusion. Just enough confussion to disuade investors but not so much as to lose credibility with new potential investors. I think patchh is working with a group who are on the bid at lower prices

[patchh]

Common Cent$ on Wts @ True Confessions extending a warrant past its expiration Date.. Does this imply a "Put Warrant" i can find early call on Wt's  --> i also see a registry of Put Warrants - looking on US Warrants Dat Sheets.. pls eloborate what a Put Warrant is ? otw - i hav very little exposure on Wts in General..  COnsolidation w Wts in large numbers ? now

[patchh]

these are essentially long call options in the States..  its against Canadian law for an americaan to exercise.. NCU is a canadian Wt..  the premium would B the exercise price when called early..  were the company to sell.. stok buy out; in mining its around 20% of a moving average...   Murdik Capital Acquisition MUDSW-MUDS - has a warrant w an intrinsic value of 3.65 and a

[lumpy13]

To put things simply:   There is no acceleration clause on the warrants by NCU. The only thing that could accelerate them would be an acquisition and, even then, the acquirer would likely just pay the warrant intrinsic value.

[Notgnu]

I am guessing here but wouldn't the aquirer, by force of negotiation with Pala not have to pay the ex-trinsic value? I mean if they were paying 5X the share trading price then I think Pala (and myself) would want a minimum of 5X the rolling 60 day average warrant price. Comments? N.

[Notgnu]

Wait... I get it now... You mean the newly created (by the share price bid) intrinsic value... yes, I think so to. N.

[patchh]

when i saw what happened last week w MUDS (a US Warant) - anything is pozzible