Post by
rockhound3 on Oct 19, 2021 2:19pm
West- this Board serves a purpose to allow us to learn and
comment.
West I am only looking to the history and have made my comments accordingly.
In my opinion if one doesnt have alternative strategies in business then one is taking inordinate risk.
On entering into the mine build at 3.25 copper - I doubt that the PALA would have been able to continue with their ownership if copper hadnt gone over $4.00
All I ask is that you consider my rationale for my comments. ie why no mention of NCU on the PALA website?
Why so many departures? = were they all incompent?
The lack of clear communication which in my mind would have avoided much of the cratering of the stock.
In all of this I try to understand why what has happened has happened???
- the source of PALA's $$
- PALA's expereince
I could go on however the past is often a good predictor of the future.
In business as in all walks of life mistakes can be made however in business one cant make too many mistakes.
Last to not have an alternative strategy ie just in case = one isnt being prudent.
As I have commented =PH will produce a lot of $$$ - the only question is who will end up the $$$?
We all appreciate the civil debate as we all learn !
Tx for your comments - which are different from mine.
Life is short - we all want to enjoy it!
ROCK