Post by
slewfoot2 on Jan 04, 2025 12:19pm
searislee?
the open pit value is a pie in the sky dream of the bagholdrers on this bored.... seams like its knot profitable , ncu did some recent work on the open pit in the last couple years, this info has not been released to the public but was available to companies that signed a NDA.... over 40 companies looked at data and all came to the conclusion that assets were not worth moar that 130 million net..... knot shure why you all cant accept this.... u were wrong....so what... thyme 2 move on....
Comment by
Dragonflyinvest on Jan 04, 2025 1:41pm
"....so what... thyme 2 move on...." No kidding! You have posted your negative opinion laced with supposition, assumption, and presumption over and over and over again. We get it. What we don’t get is why you keep wasting your time posting about a stock you have no interest in other than gloating over other people’s misfortune. One really sick puppy!
Comment by
Dragonflyinvest on Jan 05, 2025 11:30am
"…over 40 companies looked at data and all came to the conclusion that assets were not worth moar that 130 million net....” That is what we call an assumption, and one based upon no evidence what-so-ever. How about this one? Hudbay is publicly supporting local youth athletics in Yerington. Why would they do that unless they intend to be in business here?
Comment by
TomsStockHut on Jan 05, 2025 1:16pm
thats wrong. they didn't even placed an offer, which means zero, nada, nothing... Tom
Comment by
TomsStockHut on Jan 05, 2025 2:20pm
... you basically say that palas engineers and accountants and their co investor experts incl. kfw, were not able to evalute the asset properly in , how many years?
Comment by
Dragonflyinvest on Jan 07, 2025 11:13pm
" What in the world are you basing that conclusion upon ..." The feasibility study that found PH to be economically minable. I have challenged you on several occasions to provide an analysis of that study which shows any mistakes or errors in their conclusion. You have never responded.
Comment by
TallTale101 on Jan 08, 2025 11:17am
Current stockholders may prefer to cut out Kinterra, if any new buyer shows up. Pay Kinterra for their SH bid, and move on without them. Likewise, Kinterra may prefer to buy out the current shareholders if not doing so means they do not have clear title
Comment by
TallTale101 on Jan 08, 2025 6:25pm
If Kinterra is so sure they bought the mine, then why would they need multiple propagandists to promote their narrative and supposed legitimacy on this board?
Comment by
cnynman on Jan 09, 2025 10:47am
Patch, you say that 'the storks are still listed on my trade station...' Care to tell us what the quoted share price is on that trade station?
Comment by
patchh on Jan 10, 2025 1:17am
U R correct.. under nevada mine law.. a new mine owner cannot offer their stok at say' a buk and take the sale mines stok @ ten-cents / offsetting the sale price thru a equity invesrion.. albiet in favor of the new buyer -w- a discoiunt in equity conversions.. otw - ignore the joy riders..
Comment by
TomsStockHut on Jan 05, 2025 2:08pm
... so if everybody else is reading the data so differently (factor 1:25) why did pala spend all the money to build and restart NCU?