Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

The NMX Lithium Shareholders Group - Response to Charlene

[Alcide]

In the event of a Private Purchase of the remains of Nemaska Lithium under protection by a private investor, the latter does not buy the shares of the shareholders of the old company but rather its assets.
The shares of a company do not represent  an asset of the company but rather the opposite.
If Nemaska Lithium made a net profit in this private sale after having covered all its liabilities, expenses, and claims (the shareholders coming last), it could be that this net profit would be redistributed to its 847.6 million shares.
Everything seems to indicate that this net value would represent roughly zero $ / share.
The great value of the Nemaska project is not in its present equity, but in its enormous future potential.
Alcide Gour
See in French a great interview on Youtube with our president Alain Clavet 
https://nmx.zone/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V2CHcE_jkE&fbclid=IwAR0mGwQXFVHZzOKCVzg54djYzEtde_WuC5nD2xJX6mtkrcEfRewKv-t05Lc 

[Calgary_AB]

Alcide, can someone tell "your President" to take his head out of your a$$ and maybe he will realize you all made a bad investment? Only in QC investors want to gamble for the win but if they lose they want TAX payers bailout....that is not gamble, it's for sure good investment if you can't lose... I give you an A for trying and an F for the mentality you have...

[Charlene]

Thanks, Alcide!  It looks like we agree at it is possible that shareholders can benefit in a sale if the sale price is greater than its liabilities (e.g. expenses and claims).  You think that this outcome is not possible with Nemaska.  I think it is possible (with about 20 or so interested parties) and shouldn't be eliminated as an option.  Having more options to choose