Post by
Tcheck on Sep 16, 2020 8:43pm
an edda IQ collaboration would have pleased all investors
not just the board of directors
and would therefore have been the better solution .
edda it seems has identical financial means as pallinghurst
and they have the added merit of being inclined to include all shareholders .
good for the company and good for the majority of its shareholders
:)
so the survival of the company is and was not at stake here .
why chose the worst solution then ? to please LEGO politicians.
i can t find anything on EDDA though .
i would like to know who they are .
Comment by
TicTacTo on Oct 10, 2020 1:31pm
Mick, EDDA Zingher offer was a joke. Listen to law court for hours and at the end was clear for everybody not serious.
Comment by
TicTacTo on Oct 11, 2020 7:04am
Many lithium stock perform well worldwide ... in Quebec only failure NAL and NMX
Comment by
Tcheck on Oct 12, 2020 10:07am
cyn IQ a criminal organisation :)specialised in investment racket
Comment by
Calgary_AB on Oct 14, 2020 1:26am
Careful Mick, when I said Quebec was corrupt I got attacked by Longs here saying I was "AntiQuebec"...
Comment by
dalesio_98 on Oct 10, 2020 1:50pm
EDDA was represented by legal counsel in court. I firmly believe legal counsel was not paid by his client and wasted legal counsel, shareholders and the courts time!