You, Dumont, stated, "Boy , you do like to extrapolate your thoughts to some extreme, may I suggest, hyperbolic conclusions,1Student."
LOL! Here we are discussing what you consider to be my "Hyperbolic conclusions", when we should, instead be speaking to having already experienced hyperbolic shaped NanoXplore share price movements Dumont
You, Dumont, went on to state, "My point is that Nanoxplore can currently supply significantly more Graphene at a lower cost than can the Black Swan Group. That Gerdue has made similar agreements with Black Swan ( if that is ,in fact, the case) is at its most basic, simply good business , helping ensure alternate sources of graphene. The joint agreements with the other two entities, Nouveau Monde and Mason Graphite seem irrelevant unless Gerdue wants raw graphite material for some reason."
I entirely agree that NanoXplore can presently produce 300% more graphene with it's proprietary graphene manufacturing module than the projected 1,000 tpa which Black Swan Graphene is expected to produce over at Nouveau Monde Graphite's coated spherical graphite processing and manufacturing facility, in partnership with NMG.
Please, let us recall the multitudes of reasons as to why both you and I are invested here with NanoXplore and not over there with Black Swan Graphene Dumont. Obviously we are in agreement in many respects Dumont.
By the way, when I say I don't Trust Gerdau and hadn't ever trusted Gerdau representatives, such a statement on my part is primarly due to the fact that I don't trust anyone and Gerdau representatives certainly are no exception to such a rule.
The truth always is that in business noone is to be trusted. Built up and built upon and always audited "confidence", to some extent, yes; trust no, not ever.
Someone peeing away the confidence I could have lent to them is something remedied right quick; and yet someone peeing away the "trust" I would have foolsihly place at their disposal is a whole other kettle of fish so to speak.
If Gerdau wants to be able to offtake a specially priced amount of graphite from Nouveau Monde Graphite in future, I would full well expect that Gerdau representatives do intend to procure such graphite feedstock for one of it's most earlier " suppliers of graphene", i.e. NanoXplore and not some other company which was not the first to provide Gerdau with a 4,000 tpa graphene manufacturing capacity supported supply agreement.
Any-who, that's enough about Gerdau. After all, just pondering the though of NanoXplore in any way being betrayed by those operating that outfit . . . and simply makes my skin crawl, so to speak.
At this juncture, I don't care enough about graphene being adopted industry wide as comprising concrete. It's a bit of a pipe dream right now and I'd much rather focus on graphene comprised automotive parts and components. After all, such a NanoXplore business segment segment should be the company's "bread & butter going forward Dumont.
The USEPA Consent Order", Graphene Black Sheet Molding Compound ("GB SMC"), graphene enhanced automotive parts and components, Graphene Black TM comprised plastics composites and other polymer/metal hybrid composite materials and so much more is in great part why I remain invested here with NanoXplore.
Also, I believe I would be the last one who you could be electing to remind of the fact that NanoXplore's wholly owned U.S. based subsidiary did in fact receive a USEPA "Consent Order" for it's unlimited production of or importation of and use within the U.S. of Graphene BlackTM, as comprising specifically automotive parts and components products manufactured either by NanoXplore owned companies and/or perhaps by NanoXplore "authorized licensees", i.e. corporations which would be expressly permitted by NanoXplore to manufacture, produce and supply such graphene BlackTM comprised plastics and other composite products and/or complete "Graphene BlackTM" enhanced automotive parts and components for companies like Ford, GM, Volvo, etc.
What's more, what I said was, "After all, 'with no serious competition for two to three years, as you suggest, it's not as though NanoXplore can be in any way caught and be made to lose such "a two to three year jump on serious competition", this perhaps due in part to (oh, I don't know) something as trivial (not) as a intellectual property associated dispute, eh?"
Lets be clear here, I did not intend to imply that Gerdau or Black Swan would have "intellectual propertity conflicts" with Nanoxplore.
I more so had been alluding to the possibilty, as remote as you may think it to be, that NanoXplore could be forced to defend any violation of what it now claims as it's owned "prior art", with respect to the the various patents purchased from XG Sciences creditors. Intellectual property disputes are sometimes quite share price impacting, this irrespective of whom the named violating party would be determined to be.
Sheesh! I really hope the share price never has to face being impacted by such a thing Dumont. Never the less I'd want Mr. Nazarpour &Co to fight tooth and nail if they had to in defending NanoXplore from violators of NanoXplore's intellectual Properties.
You, Dumont, stated "I , in no way, suggested that Nanoxplore people relax their efforts. Merely that they have this advantage currently and they presumably will continue to improve and expand their operations. There will be further competition in the graphene industry, but I like Nanoxplore out of the starting gate."
Obviously we agree on many more things than we could ever disgree on, especially as pertains to NanoXplore's potential being greatly realized going forward Dumont.
Potentially, largew strides would be made toward such realization of potential during the next three month in particular Dumont?