Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Neo Lithium Corp NTTHF

Neo Lithium Corp is engaged in the business of exploration operations. Its principal business activities are the exploration and development of resource properties. Its project includes the 3Q project. It operates its business in the countries like Canada and Argentina, however, most of the revenue is generated from Canada.

OTCQX:NTTHF - Post Discussion

Neo Lithium Corp > Tesla's Lithium Mining
View:
Post by tiger6301 on Sep 24, 2020 8:30am

Tesla's Lithium Mining

Here are another two articles.

Tesla Says It Wants to Be a Lithium Miner. That Could Be a Problem for Extractor Stocks.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/lithium-mining-stocks-take-it-on-the-chin-tesla-extractor-batteries-51600875113

Tesla bets on mining with Nevada lithium claim

https://www.mining.com/tesla-bets-on-mining-business-with-lithium-claim/

Tesla can claim anything, but nothing is concrete.  In the mining business, Grade and Size of the projects are the king, which means the cost per unit of production.  In Tesla's case, NO one knows what type of project they have?, but CLAY, how far are they now?  In the mining business, it typically takes 10 years from start to build a mine.  LAC is the most advanced clay lithium project in NV, I know LAC at least 10 years since the Western Uranium days.

We all know Tesla is a great company in the EV business, but not necessary in the mining business.  If they want to compete in the mining business, then let do it.  They may have advantage in capital, but their projects may not be the best ones.  By the end of day, it is the cost of lithium products.  

I see the best way for Tesla to souce raw materials is to JV mining companies, rather than doing it themselves since they are NOT MINING EXPERTERS.

I say it will take Tesla at least 5 years to get their lithium product from their clay.

The market is just over reacted to its claim.

tiger
Comment by JMark80 on Sep 24, 2020 8:59am
Would be interesting to know more about the geology of their deposit. They make extracting through artificial brine sound so easy!
Comment by JMark80 on Sep 24, 2020 9:05am
If they do have water soluble clay (it's possible, some of Noram's deposit is water soluble), it would also be interesting to know more about production costs. Could spell trouble for the non hectorite acid leachable clays that are struggling to move forward. Acid plants are expensive!
Comment by Papino0 on Sep 24, 2020 9:22am
Hahah that's almost unbelievable, how dumb this is, some weeks ago uranium one ( an experience miner tied to the russian gov. ) said they would take 10% of the lithium market by 2030, LIT made ,5% . Even better Rio Tinto one of the biggest and most profitable mining company announced the 30 july that they would advance their enormous Jada project of Serbia to feasibility with a 200 M ...more  
Comment by tiger6301 on Sep 24, 2020 10:21am
Hi Papino, Excellent article, thx. tiger
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities