Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oromin Explorations Ltd OLEPF

GREY:OLEPF - Post Discussion

Oromin Explorations Ltd > Cap. costs $297.1 million to $504.7 million dollar
View:
Post by frankman on Jan 31, 2013 10:56am

Cap. costs $297.1 million to $504.7 million dollar

Capital Cost Estimates (As at Q1 2013) Ouch and in Africa no less (Mali next door)

Pre-production development capital for project facilities is estimated to be approximately $297.1 million, which includes open pit mobile equipment costs, underground mine development for the Kerekounda and Kourloulou deposits, plant and infrastructure construction and commissioning costs, as well as site infrastructure construction costs plus contingency. Ongoing life-of-mine sustaining capital is $208.0 million, including underground mobile equipment replacements, waste facility expansions, sustaining capital estimates for fixed plant and infrastructure and ongoing underground development. The sustaining capital also covers the preproduction capital for later Golouma underground mines that commence development once the Golouma open pit mine has provided access.

A contingency has been added to the underlying capital cost estimates that reflects the level of risk associated with those estimates. The overall weighted-average contingency for the entire capital program is 11%. The capital cost estimate for the project is summarized in the following table.

Table 5: LOM Capital Cost Estimate

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ($M USD) Total Initial Sustaining
UG Mine Development Capital 30.6 2.9 27.7
UG Mine Mobile Equipment 59.6 20.5 39.0
UG Mine Infrastructure 4.4 1.1 3.2
Open Pit Mine Capital 80.0 31.3 48.7
Process Plant 70.6 67.1 3.5
Infrastructure 59.4 56.5 3.0
Sustaining Capital for Mill and Infrastructure 14.0 - 14.0
Indirects, Mine and Miscellaneous 52.6 50.0 2.6
Tailings, Water and Roads 44.7 19.8 24.8
Owners Costs 20.0 20.0 -
Closure 17.5 - 17.5
       
Contingency @ 11% 51.3 27.9 23.5
TOTAL CAPITAL COST 504.7 297.1 207.7
Comment by parkssam on Jan 31, 2013 11:01am
Frankman  from your very first post you have slammed OLE. No problem but if you don't own the stock are you either short or just trying to save us from ourselves?   Oh and one little tidbit - those estimated costs are not even remotely out of whack so your tactics will be limited to the uninformed (which around here is many).
Comment by frankman on Jan 31, 2013 11:15am
Remember Park those costs are subject to cost over runs (with my decades of experience has seen) . Not to mention the country risk factor. Those apply if everything goes to plan. How likely is that?
Comment by findthegold on Jan 31, 2013 11:21am
there will be cost over runs..for sure...there will also be more gold in the ground from future exploration in the area...at the end of the day it is up to management of OLE and TGZ to get a deal done that will benefit OLE shareholders now and TGZ shareholders down the road
Comment by tony1969 on Jan 31, 2013 11:29am
Findthegold, I could not have said that better myself.  Well said and I totally agree.
Comment by parkssam on Jan 31, 2013 11:29am
frankman  when you answer either you're short or savings us from ourselves I will respond further but until you do so you're nothing more than someone who thinks they're important and like to scare the little people.
Comment by frankman on Feb 01, 2013 2:18pm
More regurgited poster hype. Do you recognize a pump and dump folks. Grab your ankles. Too bad about the capex  Capital Cost Estimates (As at Q1 2013) Ouch and in Africa no less (Mali next door) Pre-production development capital for project facilities is estimated to be approximately $297.1 million, which includes open pit mobile equipment costs, underground mine development for the ...more  
Comment by comet52 on Feb 01, 2013 3:10pm
So OLE is a pump and dump. Who knew!?   Thanks for taking the time to help us all out, frankman.
Comment by arlene2 on Feb 01, 2013 3:49pm
comet52----frankman does not have a clue what is presently going on with Oromin......ALL his dire outlooks for this particular stock will be proven wrong within the next 60 days (most likely) , but no later than 90 days....All that education and experience that he claims to have will not have served him well on his conclusions re Oromin...Keep the faith-----Ignore the venomous ...more  
Comment by frankman on Feb 12, 2013 1:01pm
Capital Cost Estimates (As at Q1 2013) Ouch and in Africa no less (Mali next door) Pre-production development capital for project facilities is estimated to be approximately $297.1 million, which includes open pit mobile equipment costs, underground mine development for the Kerekounda and Kourloulou deposits, plant and infrastructure construction and commissioning costs, as well as site ...more  
Comment by tony1969 on Feb 12, 2013 1:09pm
This is why they are going to merge or get bought out by TGZ franky. Don't you get it.
Comment by tony1969 on Feb 12, 2013 1:20pm
In case you have not noticed franky, TGZ has the mill and most of the equipment needed to mine Oromin's property.  Yes they will incurr more expenses as they will be mining substantially more gold and be using more equipment but you can forget about those $300 million start up costs you are talking about. The mill and their proximty are the two most important synergies that will ...more  
Comment by parkssam on Feb 12, 2013 4:10pm
Tony, this poster frankman is not here for anything remotely what you and most others are. Having conversations with him actually make his type think they're relevant when in fact nothing could be further from the truth. You make a lot of sense in yout TGZ and OLE scenario albeit far too many times. TGZ supporters can try and spin it differently but TGZ spent tens of millions of dollars on ...more  
Comment by tony1969 on Feb 12, 2013 7:18pm
Thanks parks.  It does not take a genius to know that TGZ was high grading.  That is how they met last years ounce projections whlie not overspending.  This year will be different as they already stated.  I truly do not think Chet will overplay his hand this time. He will not give us away but he knows that conditions in the junior market are not ideal (understatement) to be ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities