Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Curis Resources Ltd PCCRF

GREY:PCCRF - Post Discussion

Curis Resources Ltd > Grassroots Opposition
View:
Post by sungoldaz on May 31, 2012 2:40pm

Grassroots Opposition

Very funny, Elgin1.  Actually, I was trying to point out the dangers of transporting the huge quantities of sulfuric acid required for in-situ mining.  On January 31, 2012 there was a hazardous chemical incident not far from here on SR 77 between Winkleman and Globe where a tanker truck loaded with sufuric acid leaked the acid on to the highway and closed it for hours.  In addition to the sulfuric acid, there are at least 10 other toxic chemicals that will be shipped to Florence on Hunt Highway and stored on-site in a tank farm.  The large number of tanker trucks using the two-lane highway and the tank farm they'll be stored in certainly won't be unobtrusive; but Curis says you'll hardly know they're there.  Sure.  Also, maybe you should ask Curis why they publicly told many people before their zoning change was denied, including a State Senator, that it wouldn't be financially feasible to mine just the State land and then, after the denial, they suddenly decided they could make a go of mining only that small, 160-acre plot.  Do you think it has anything to do with trying to inflate their stock price and not scare off their investors?  Also, as an investor, I sure would be skeptical of a company that gives away 25% or more of its production over the life of the project just to get $40 million to run a short-term production test facility on 160 acres.
Comment by elgin1 on May 31, 2012 7:59pm
Sungoldaz - you have been spending too much time in the sun or drinking the water from Johnson Utilities.   So there are thousands of tanker trucks delivering diesel fuel, gasoline every day in more pollulated areas. The risk of an accident is just the same - so your argument is weak. Second, the copper deposit sits half on the state land and half on the town land.  The 160 ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities