Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Curis Resources Ltd PCCRF

GREY:PCCRF - Post Discussion

Curis Resources Ltd > Economics very good BUT need to face up to Re developers
View:
Post by soccer57 on Jun 02, 2014 11:52am

Economics very good BUT need to face up to Re developers

Look at who opposes the project because of potential water contamination concerns.
Look at who is fighting the project (owner of Phoenix Suns NBA team is just one partner along with a multi $billion New York/Brazilian real estate developer) who have a team of lawyers and massive $$$$ resources due to their own extensive international real estate interests.

It is a bummer but It is a reality, an exceptionally strong adversary stands in the way
2 two exceptionally powerful adversaries:
Do these business interests have some political pull with Federal politicians like senators and representatives with the potential to delay/influence EPA action? who knows ? How does politics work?
face it .....deal with it and move on
Run the project numbers with the realistic additional expenses necessary to `with certainty' buy out the adversary...then if economic... should be Build the project with ithe additional expenses factored in.
Project has very strong economic. strong copper project but until this situation is dealt with ??
get the Real estate interests to `go away"


https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2010/04/05/daily56.html?page=all

San Diego-based Southwest Value Partners and Golden Tree Insite Partners of New York and Sao Paulo, Brazil, are buying a 4,508-acre parcel at Merrill Ranch in Pinal County. The property had been taken back in 2009 by a group of 62 lenders after the owner, Merrill Ranch Investments LLC of Scottsdale and Atlanta, defaulted on a $100 million loan.

The buyers did not disclose the purchase price, but local trade publication, Business Real Estate Weekly, wrote that the purchase price was nearly $27.7 million.

SVP is jointly owned by Phoenix Suns majority owner Robert Sarver and Mark Schlossberg. Sarver is also chairman and CEO of Western Alliance Bancorp. SVP provided 30 percent of the funding and will manage day-to-day operations of the partnership with GTIS Partners, which invested 70 percent of the equity capital.

The purchase is the second associated with the foreclosure. The Phoenix Business Journal wrote about marketing of the property in June 2009, when Bull Realty of Atlanta was retained by People’s Bank of Winder, Ga., the lead lender, to seek offers on the land.

Bull Realty announced in January that it had obtained a buyer for 1,182 acres of the total 5,690-acre parcel. The undisclosed buyer of the first parcel paid a little over $8 million.

On its Web site, Bull Realty says both purchases added up to $36 million, or $7 million more than the bank consortium paid at the foreclosure auction to take back the property.

The SVP/GTIS news release states that the parcel is “partially entitled for up to 18,000 residential lots and an additional 900 acres are fully entitled for commercial use.” The land is located on both sides of the Hunt Highway west of Florence.

The partnership will hold onto the land until new home building gains traction again.

“As the Phoenix population and employment growth continues to stabilize, the residential lot market should return to equilibrium in the next several years,” Schlossberg said in the news release.


https://www.gtispartners.com/usinvestments

About Us

GTIS Partners is a global real estate investment firm headquartered in New York with offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco and São Paulo, Brazil. GTIS Partners was founded in 2005 and is managed by President Tom Shapiro and Senior Managing Directors Josh Pristaw, Rob Vahradian, Bill Cisneros and Joao Teixeira.

GTIS Partners has 65 employees and currently has approximately $2.8 billion of assets under management. The firm pursues opportunistic real estate investments through direct equity investment and non-traditional lending activities. To date, the firm has committed capital to residential, retail, industrial, office, hotel and mixed-use projects in the U.S. and Brazil, and is among the largest real estate private equity companies in Brazil.

The principals of GTIS Partners have over 100 years of investment, management and operations experience, which spans all major property types and geographies. By combining hands-on real estate expertise with a disciplined investment approach, GTIS Partners creates value for its investors and partners.
Comment by elgin1 on Jun 02, 2014 11:19pm
Then they can buy out curis city portion of land for $200 million. Did you know every real estate tranaction has a disclaimer on it by state of Arizona that states their is an existing mine in close proximity when they purchased the land. They purchased the land after curis had bought it knowing that curis was a going to develop the mine. SWVP also wanted a premium on their property from curis to ...more  
Comment by soccer57 on Jun 04, 2014 4:01pm
Clarify please  `SWVP have done this before the are a real edr are hedge fund that squeezes leverage out of their property.' Thanks Elgin Soccer
Comment by elgin1 on Jun 04, 2014 5:33pm
Check your PM.
Comment by Metalsguy1 on Jun 06, 2014 1:23pm
SWVP and their ilk represent the very worst of capitalism. Hedge funds are typically funded by high net worth indviduals and because they are not publicly traded they are not subject to the same regulations as a public traded company. I have voiced my concerns in writing to the EPA about the endless delays in issuing the draft permit and made a point of highlighting my concerns over any ...more  
Comment by Metalsguy1 on Jul 16, 2014 11:17am
I have to question your authenticity at this point. I have done an extensive amount of research and although there may be some political connections, those connections ARE NOT influencing the UIC permitting process. Based on my due diligence, the EPA is acting wholly in accordance with federal statutes - the time being spent is likely to result in a very very solid decision from the EPA.
Comment by soccer57 on Jul 18, 2014 5:00pm
Metals guy  Authenticity?  what do you mean?  Are you talking about me being authentic? I am a retired Investment Banker.  I want the stock to go from  $.80 to $3.00 not back and forth because they have an albatross hanging around their neck. Authentic?  The company sent me the email i posted on the real estate developers competition  Curis sent it to me. Is ...more  
Comment by adit123 on Aug 13, 2014 9:32am
Good post soccer. I don't own CUV now (I did a ways back) but remember Sussie Bell telling me that 'management would not be blackmailed into buying out (paying off) the developers'. I thought at the time that was a bad idea, especially given the influence the development community had on the local politicians. It is not like this current situation is hindsight. EPA is stalling on the ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities