Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."

GREY:PGDIF - Post Discussion

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > Deep drill this summer?
View:
Post by MrBigger on May 07, 2016 11:36am

Deep drill this summer?

That would take a lot of cash they do not have. You guys have built how many mines? How can you keep trotting out capex #'s that are 50-75% lower than Victor, SWY, MPV, DDC, etc. PGD has problems even getting core samples out to civilization. Then there is "The FOG"

Also PEA's can be so bogus. Just look at copper fox's PEA  VS the FS for Schaft Creek.
Comment by ekim on May 07, 2016 11:42am
Are you already discounting the PEA? Hilarious. We should all ignore my, JK, and now JDS capital cost estimate and use yours instead? You must be very special.long...pgd...ekim
Comment by Kidlapik on May 07, 2016 12:19pm
SWY = Underground mine, large road built, far more remote, bigger mill MPV = Much bigger mill size DDC = Under lakes, much bigger mill size Victor = Much bigger operation, 2.7million tonnes a year If you want a REASONABLE apples to apples example look at the Jericho Mine that is now shuttered. Firstly it is important to note it was a terrible pipe to develop, nowhere NEAR a CH-6 quality, and that ...more  
Comment by mill44 on May 07, 2016 12:56pm
I think people missing a point. The main question was if they have enough to warrant a mine. I think that was answered. If you take in consideration the size of the Friedlands' holding, do you see a chance that they will abandon this project? I don't. They will either sell it or build a mine themselves. I would prefer selling, it would be quicker and would not require more money from us ...more  
Comment by oiltar on May 07, 2016 2:14pm
kidlapik.You have hit the nail right on the head with your capx and Victor. TomP is bound by 43-101 I'am not so I will say what he can't say. His Northern Miner comment about CH-6 being in the top 4 or 5 margin pipes in the world is his way of saying "we think" as 43-101 rules  do not allow him to tell the truth until his PEA proves it. The CH-6 is not 4 or 5 in the top ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities