Post by
Silverwhere on Aug 09, 2016 2:49pm
xDeBeers
With all due respect xDB, and please correct me if Im wrong, I believe many discoveries (and mines) have come to fruition on properties which have been explored by others before. For whatever reason, whether it be exploration budget constraints, missed-it-by-that-much horizontally and/or vertically, wrong angle, just plain vanilla bad luck (am sure you can list off a top twenty other reasons), prior exploration attempts fail, and for some reason future newbies and/or oldies are luckier. This is, after all, a game of chance. Just ask Robert Friedland about patience and dogged determination in Mongolia. See Early Encounters, Western Interest, including Ivanhoes Breakthrough; summary here . . . . . https://blogs.ubc.ca/mongolia/2016/oyu-tolgoi-discovery/ . . . . . . . The company completed 109 drill holes by September 2000, with encouraging results. Ivanhoe subsequently opened a major office in Ulaanbaatar under the name of Ivanhoe Mines Mongolia Inc (IMMI). HOWEVER, 149 drill holes were completed before the projects eureka DISCOVERY hole, OTD-150, was drilled in in Southwest zone of the Oyu Tolgoi area in July 2001. Some want people to believe the world is still flat. The fact of the matter is this: resolute EXPLORERS have disproved this old thesis, and a better life goes on, thank you very much. So xDB, did your team do absolutely everything in their powers, did you punch 150 deep holes like IVN for instance? Probably not. You most likely have a prudent and frugal budget to snoop around, relatively speaking, as far as your prelim work pertaining to an early stage of a longer term diamond exploration process. Will others after you crash and burn? Maybe. Can someone in a future exploration program get lucky? Maybe, maybe not. But to say diamonds will absolutely NEVER be found is a stretch, no? Again, correct me if Im wrong. I am not a geo expert. You are? Thanks in advance.
Comment by
Silverwhere on Aug 09, 2016 3:01pm
From the Aug 04, 2016 PGD NR . . Peregrines Sikwane prospecting licence PL272/2015 covers 453 km2 and contains nine kimberlites discovered through percussion and limited core drilling by De Beers in 1997. This previous work recovered diamonds from surface samples and from down-hole samples at the Sikwane kimberlites, although diamond abundance and size distribution data are not available. . . . .
Comment by
cudjo on Aug 09, 2016 3:33pm
Small to medium leftovers does not justify spending a million bucks when you have money to spend on potential economic targets on Baffin. Remember for every one explorer who goes over old ground and finds a few bones, there are hundreds that are left on the dead pile of junior exploration companies, total waste of capital in this juniors timeline. Move on
Comment by
Silverwhere on Aug 09, 2016 3:46pm
the eggspurt has spoken LOL
Comment by
Silverwhere on Aug 09, 2016 8:26pm
Thanks xDB. One more question . . . You do have the coordinates for those 2 Western pipes squirrelled away? No need to answer publicly.
Comment by
racer-x on Aug 09, 2016 4:23pm
When PGD announced the Botswana exploration at the same time an article in WSJ announced DeBeers decided to go back to Botswana so I always assumed PGD was acting for DeBeers somehow am I wrong?
Comment by
racer-x on Aug 10, 2016 9:43am
They must be sharing the same driller with DeBeers who is also drilling targets for DeBeers in Botswana at the same time, only cost PGD $200k?
Comment by
xDeBeers on Aug 09, 2016 7:57pm
@silverwhere there are a few answers to your question, and Ekim has touched on one of them. It is of course possible that PGD will find a small marginal deposit at Sikwane. But De Beers does not walk away from world class deposits (unless they are in war torn Africa). So if PGD finds something in Botswana, it will be small, or low grade or both. Or dolerite.