Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."

GREY:PGDIF - Post Discussion

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > light is shining
View:
Post by cudjo on Jan 27, 2017 3:17pm

light is shining

in for a few of you, Ollie is turning once again, will be dumping hard as he buys, he has the end of the month as his drop dead date for any announcements, he has confirmed my thoughts in regards to the PDAC and downsizing of the company, what say the board, how long can they go without announcing anything that you will finally acknowledge there will be no winter program this year?  Just curious.  The company is not dead, there are diamonds, even ekim has resigned himself to 2021/22, but, with another week gone by with nothing news wise, it is looking like it will be another year before they even begin to think about a bulk sample and adding info for a FS
Comment by MrBigger on Jan 27, 2017 3:27pm
I know HPX's focus is on base metals but could they strike a deal with PGD??
Comment by shneps on Jan 27, 2017 4:34pm
I just wanted to post this (2013) article because I found it interesting but more revelent to the question of timing. When you drift your mouse over the photos of the Peregrine convoy you will note the dates of the convoy leaving Iqaluit on March 9th and the CH6 trenching being performed and kimberlite being hauled back April 16th. https://www.miningandenergy.ca/nunavut/article/peregrine_diamonds ...more  
Comment by ekim on Jan 27, 2017 5:39pm
Exactly why I said that this could be the most productive work programme ever at Chidliak. All that equipment being shipped from Iqaluit is already on site. The LDD RC drill rig is also on site. The core drill has been onsite for quite a long time. A lot fewer things going into site this year means they can get onsite and start cranking out the kimberlite and get it back on the trail back to ...more  
Comment by alberto782007 on Jan 27, 2017 5:59pm
To be paid for how?
Comment by cudjo on Jan 27, 2017 6:07pm
ah, now theres the rub now... tick tock
Comment by mill44 on Jan 27, 2017 6:33pm
People like Robert don't play it by ear. They don't go loading up on shares multiple times hoping that they can sell the project one day who knows when. He made plans in case there is no buyer, or if he cannot get the price he wants. Shelving everything will not help the SP and will not leave him in a better position at the bargaining table later. Investing another 15M will though. He can ...more  
Comment by ekim on Jan 27, 2017 6:53pm
"To be paid for how?" This how: "Since Peregrine Diamonds announced its positive preliminary economic assessment (PEA) for the Chidliak diamond project, Nunavut, Canada, on July 7, 2016, the company has been in discussions with a number of diamond producers and capital funds concerning the continuing development of this very valuable diamond asset. The company is continuing ...more  
Comment by mill44 on Jan 27, 2017 11:43pm
That's a "could", not a definite "how". The SP is where it is because we have no idea about the how.
Comment by ekim on Jan 28, 2017 11:43am
Technicalities. Good on you Mill. Must be me ignoring things again. LONG...PGD EKIM
Comment by griefman on Jan 28, 2017 2:12pm
So a definite could is better than a definite how?
Comment by ekim on Jan 28, 2017 4:35pm
Kodi, the How is more of the physical transfer of funds. I would probably suspect that PGD has already arranged a net30 or net60 or more preferably a net90 day policy with the contractors involved in the work. Then within that 90 days of receiving an invoice from the contractor...PGD would either write a physical cheque to send in the mail to the companies involved...or do a bank transfer of ...more  
Comment by cudjo on Jan 28, 2017 4:40pm
and that would be very irresponsible wthout having funding or a partner, tick tock
Comment by mill44 on Jan 28, 2017 4:53pm
Thanks, Ekim. Good explanation on the "how". But, as always with PGD, it brings up more questions. Like "why". As: Why would those checks not bounce?
Comment by mill44 on Jan 28, 2017 5:13pm
And if you think I am bugging you because I am bearish on the project, here is the other "why". Why would the Friedlands give up half of the project for 60 or 80c, even for 1$ when 2 years after the mine opening they could have a 50-60M cash flow from it for years? Your explanation for the slow negotiations is the complexity of the problem, but it could be as simple as greed. That's ...more  
Comment by alberto782007 on Jan 30, 2017 12:32pm
Exactly.  Here's hoping rich partner rather than share sale at tens cents.
Comment by griefman on Jan 30, 2017 12:51pm
Does anyone believe that the winter program would be "shelved" or will they go ahead with it with a PP to save it at all costs, or is it really a necessity going forward? Seems unlikely that this would be the end all of everything transpired to this point.
Comment by mill44 on Jan 30, 2017 2:00pm
It's not necessarily about the winter program, but about moving the project further along towards the mine. That could mean more drilling or just starting the permitting. There is no benefit to doing nothing. Time will not put them in better position at the negotiating table. They might as well just accept whatever offer they get now if they are not willing to invest more money in Chidliak.
Comment by cudjo on Jan 27, 2017 6:13pm
and to be totally fair, they announced that program Jan 28, 2013, but they had funding in place as well..... https://www.peregrinediamonds.com/news/news-releases/peregrine-announces-cad5-million-work-plan-at-chidliak-commencement-of-bulk-sampling-program-and-new-diamond-results-for-ch-6
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities